Sorry I dont view two people dying as statistics. People here try to put on quotes "well only .0062 percent of people have to go to the hospital after riding". You know what? Thats .0062 percent too much for me. These people that died were human beings. Too many people here are trying to downplay this tragic event and there acting as if nothing happened. Sometimes it's easier to sweep things under the rug then to deal with them head on. There needs to be a serious investigation on M:S. I'm not saying tear it down, but research the problem, and adjust the ride accordingly.Pongo said:You need to take a statistics class.
dimebagdarrel said:There needs to be a serious investigation on M:S. I'm not saying tear it down, but research the problem, and adjust the ride accordingly.
Connor002 said:Just as a quick question...
What do you want them to do?
Dust for fingerprints?
DNA tests?
What will it solve?
Nothing.
dimebagdarrel said:How about they finish the saftey tests that they failed to complete?
Nothing, NOTHING is ever 100% safe. Only abstinence.dimebagdarrel said:Sorry I dont view two people dying as statistics. People here try to put on quotes "well only .0062 percent of people have to go to the hospital after riding". You know what? Thats .0062 percent too much for me. These people that died were human beings. Too many people here are trying to downplay this tragic event and there acting as if nothing happened. Sometimes it's easier to sweep things under the rug then to deal with them head on. There needs to be a serious investigation on M:S. I'm not saying tear it down, but research the problem, and adjust the ride accordingly.
dimebagdarrel said:Sorry I dont view two people dying as statistics. People here try to put on quotes "well only .0062 percent of people have to go to the hospital after riding". You know what? Thats .0062 percent too much for me. These people that died were human beings. Too many people here are trying to downplay this tragic event and there acting as if nothing happened. Sometimes it's easier to sweep things under the rug then to deal with them head on. There needs to be a serious investigation on M:S. I'm not saying tear it down, but research the problem, and adjust the ride accordingly.
You do not know that tests were left incomplete.dimebagdarrel said:How about they finish the saftey tests that they failed to complete?
.dimebagdarre said:How about doing more research on the effects of g forces in a centrifuge
Why? Nothing has been traced to the ride.dimebagdarre said:Even maybe look into toning the ride down a tad.
kcnole said:Ok, now you lost me too goth. I was with your arguments up until this point. You've now entered that zone that many people get to on internet message boards and are arguing just to argue. This happens all too often on message boards, you have to defend your position so you defend it to the extreme.
mousermerf said:Just wanted to note...
143 people out of 8.6bil went to the hospital after riding before the 4yo died.
In terms of riders, that's one every 60,139 rides. So that means one every 4-5 days. Or, if you'd rather compare it in terms of time.. The ride was open for roughly 2 years before the 4yo died. 52 weeks times 2.. divided by 143.. times the number of days in a week.. equal 5.
Someone goes to the hospital from M:S roughly every 5 days.
I think that's a bit excessive..
Pongo said:Disney makes that point very clear with the 17 CLEARLY VISIBLE warning signs throught the queue.
dxwwf3 said:Something else I was thinking of today is how Disney puts warnings for many attractions. Look at the warnings for Kilimanjaro Safaris, for example. If people read these type of warnings for mild attractions, they assume that Disney just puts these types of warnings up for everything. And to a degree, I can see that point of view because I have seen Disney warnings for so many years. Sometimes they tend to over exaggerate a bit.
Does anyone else think that this might have an effect on people that give the more intense attractions a try?
mousermerf said:Just wanted to note...
143 people out of 8.6bil went to the hospital after riding before the 4yo died.
In terms of riders, that's one every 60,139 rides. So that means one every 4-5 days. Or, if you'd rather compare it in terms of time.. The ride was open for roughly 2 years before the 4yo died. 52 weeks times 2.. divided by 143.. times the number of days in a week.. equal 5.
Someone goes to the hospital from M:S roughly every 5 days.
I think that's a bit excessive..
dimebagdarrel said:Sorry I dont view two people dying as statistics. People here try to put on quotes "well only .0062 percent of people have to go to the hospital after riding". You know what? Thats .0062 percent too much for me. These people that died were human beings. Too many people here are trying to downplay this tragic event and there acting as if nothing happened.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.