Christian Fronckowiak
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- Yes
Thanks for clarifying. How about using the analogy of Superstar Limo to Mike and Sulley to the Rescue instead?
Last edited:
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Norway Pavilion Frozen construction - Frozen Ever After ride
- Status
Kate F
Well-Known Member
I'm really not expecting much from this at all, and am quite shocked it is taking so long, but on the bright side, the area should look nice and I'm sure that kids will love it. That's about as far as my optimism goes for this though. As of right now, I expect the ride to be a slightly better version of Mermaid with better animatronics and effects. And I don't think too highly of Mermaid.
ToTBellHop
Well-Known Member
The timescLe certainly is embarrassing but who cares? Seemingly none of us are excited about this coming so does it matter if it opens in May or November? Personally, I'm more interested in DAK's additions this year, which are coming long before Frozstrom.
Some of us don't have to...
Quite a bit was done. Not as much as Frozenstrom admittedly.
Or never will....
ToTBellHop
Well-Known Member
It's a bit much to suggest there is any ride at WDW that you will NEVER experience. I think I'm a reasonable person and although I'm not the least bit excited for this ride, I'll still ride it because that's what you do on a Walt Disney World vacation. You go on rides, especially new ones, to form your own opinions. I suspect it will become a ride that is "ok" but not something I need to experience every WDW vacation. Kinda like Maelstrom. Except Maelstrom at least belonged where it was. I'm a bit beyond focusing on ride placement at Epcot anymore though. It's such a hodgepodge that I just hope for compelling new attractions. I have high hopes that it will at least have a few nice animatronics.
PizzaPlanet
Well-Known Member
I bet you're so excited that you've ridden it in your dreams! The hype for this thing is real.
TyTrap
Well-Known Member
all it is is a money grab like I said. There was no rational behind the decision to replace maelstrom with frozen other than a monitary one and rightfully so because after all Disney world ain't there for free. my bitterness isn't towards the ride itself, my bitterness is towards Disney ruining the integrity of world showcase. How can anyone tell me that frozen is a better representation of Norway than the maelstrom?
No, it isn't. You wish to ride it, by all means enjoy....
HauntedMansion513
Active Member
I'd put money on you riding it at least once.
You are more than welcome to put your money anywhere you like....
Matt_Black
Well-Known Member
Hey, now! That's saucy.
Just offering some free financial advice....
Matt_Black
Well-Known Member
HauntedMansion513
Active Member
Matt_Black
Well-Known Member
I respect how resolute you are in your position.
Now we're talking about positions, too?!? Will the sauciness never end?!?
HauntedMansion513
Active Member
Haha par for the course here isn't it?
Horizons '83
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
Oh I'll ride it for sure, I think every new offering deserves a chance, but this particular one has me sour because of the politics that actually won to get this approved for where it is located.
HauntedMansion513
Active Member
That's what I've been getting at. I completely understand not liking the plan/the placement of the ride. And I definitely think Frozen called for a much more fleshed out right, preferably in Fantasyland, however, I think it deserves at least one ride through before giving it a final verdict.
- Status