71jason
Well-Known Member
...unless it works, and Art of Animation is full to capacity in 2 years.
My point--it's great for the hotels if it works. But it's a surprisingly small percentage of guests who stay on-site--the world's largest time share is on 192, with several more town-sized ones off Old Lake Wilson. Then think of all the hotels still left on 192, 535, I-Drive. And still a few days guests from downtown or Daytona (ever been to the parks the weekend of the Capitol One Bowl or the 500?). If off-site guests* think they're getting the smelly end of the plunger, that's one more reason to go elsewhere.
And again, how many on-site guests will learn enough to take advantage of the system? If I'm on a convention staying in a $500/night room, I don't anticipate having to watch a video two months out on how to take advantage of that.
* I'm ignoring APs for now, not sure how that shakes out. My guess is the "lifestylers" learn to game the system better than anyone, while more casual APs end up feeling shunted. Also, this is nothing but bad for the 50,000 or so CMs in the area, many of whom are Disney fans inclined to hang out around the parks and spend at least a little money.
And before we begin blowing the Potter trumpet, let's not forget, Universal's system of offering queue advantages to their resort guests offers an even greater advantage to these guests than FastPassPlus, and predates it.
I meant more for the general business failing of giving your struggling competitor a way back into contention, by letting the most valuable IP in the world slip through your fingers because you can't compromise with the creator's artistic integrity--something your company used to be famous for.. But as for Universal's Express Pass, it's not as blatently obvious as FastPass, mostly because so few people use it. And the original system (basically a carbon copy of Disney's) wasn't around long enough to be ingrained in the public consciousness like FastPass is at this point.