How dare them give the people what they want!:lol:
I think this should be the top priority at DCA (making it something people want to experience) to draw crowds to the parks. I agree with Scar, in that these three attractions (save World of Color, as I thought that was supposed to tie in with the "childhood Walt" spin...is that the case? I could
very well be wrong on that) don't fit extremely well.
Cars is set on Route 66 in the vicinity of Arizona and New Mexico. As far as general setting goes, I'll give that a pass on being 'close enough' to California as the movie has several details that were inspired by California. However, as an entire land, "Cars" has more to do with Pixar and the Cars franchise than it has to do with California. I have no problem with loose theming especially when it gets people into the park, but to call Carsland strong theming for DCA is pushing it.
Little Mermaid is not set in California. California is proximated next to the Pacific Ocean and Little Mermaid is set in an ocean...that's about the extent of the similarities so far as I see them. I would consider that pretty loose.
At the end of the day, DCA desperately needs to lure guests. These three attractions do just that, albeit with loose theming. What's the harm in that? Supporters of the expansion shouldn't crouch their argument in these attractions fitting the theme of DCA, but in these attractions being extremely positive for DCA. No reason to defend on an off-base rationale when an exceedingly good rationale exists for the inclusion of these attractions.
Now...to tie this to the Magic Kingdom and Fantasyland. The Magic Kingdom, and Fantasyland in particular, are already extremely popular. There is no sense in compromising theme to draw guests. There is no need to draw, so build attractions that fit the theme, and work well in Fantasyland.
Personally, I think any coaster that's more intense (or any attraction more intense) than Barnstormer is a bit too much (not necessarily thematically, but just as a general proposition).