Darkbeer1
Well-Known Member
A poster over on micechat named Baloo reposted this info from another site. The info is from Darkbeer, who has been online in the Disney community since the late 1990's and Al Lutz's DIG site. Darkbeer kind of went AWOL for years back around 2010, but he's a very solid source when it comes to stuff like this.
Thanks for the kind words, just found this thread, and I should add a few things that might help the discussion.
First some of the things you have seen in the news have sources I know very well, well my wife knows him better
But let add some more things to think about.
First off, let's get to the city of Anaheim and what is on the plate.
If you go to the Anaheim Planning Commission website, you will find some very basic info in regards to DEV2016-00014, which is the proposal that Disney filed with the city to team up with a specific timeline they want. (project 3 on the August 9th deadline).
http://gis.anaheim.net/developmentactivity/
Disney did selectively give two main Newspapers in the area some of the maps (the one first featured at OC Disney (aka Register/SCNG) and some of the conception art. Since Disney knew that there would be some release due to public records laws, they went proactive.
If you look at the August 9th deadline and the attached calendar, currently the proposal is going under staff review by the city. They have until September 6th to finalize the thoughts and recommendations in writing (staff reports). So sometime shortly after that date, there will be a release of info to the public, and that the scheduled public hearing will be at 5 PM, September 19th at City Hall. (EDITED to add, then the city council has the right to review and hold another public hearing for the next two months or so)
Now, Disney and/or the city can decided to push it back if the staff reports has issues/changes that the parties want to work on prior to the hearing. But it looks like the September 19th date works with Disney's scheduled and announcing the Carousel In closing in October. (Edit - Disney can start the closure and preparation of demolition by removing items prior to the official City Council approval).
Also, if you want to look into agreements that Disney and the city made in 2015 in regards to no admission tax for at least 30 years, for spending $1 Billion in infrastructure. A promise of a new parking structure, and improvements to traffic flow issues. So Disney is asking for the current Pumbaa lot (mainly used for CM parking now) to be the new structure promised, and will work with the city in regards to traffic flow, either by building structure (such as a bridge) or reimbursing the city for changes that the city has to do, since the land is owned by the city, and not Disney, such as roadways and sidewalks. (Since the proposed bridge is actually "private", it can be built by Disney).
We also know, going back to the major I-5 freeway improvements that Orange County did using a sales tax increase, that when that project was designed, that the "original" parking lot entrance at Harbor and Disney Way was still a major traffic issue, and that freeway access to the road was designed to handle heavy loads.
We also know that the city of Anaheim has quietly stopped accepting applications and even dropped mentioning the current "Anaheim/OC Walk of Stars", which is the current public sidewalk next to the current Taxi Stand on the west side of Harbor.
We also know that deals were made between the city and Disney, plus Anaheim GardenWalk and Wincome Group when it got approval for the rebate of the ToT Hotel Tax for the Four 4 star Hotels being promised last month, two of them on Disney Way (AGW and the JW Marriott and the current Anaheim Plaza property). While those properties still have to get their projects through the Planning Commission in the future, we know they have the zoning approved.
So those are the hard facts, and of course, things are subject to change between the time of plan submission and final approval. And of course, you can also always get permit changes made if the city approves them after that.
We also know that the city works with those planning to submit an application prior to actually being filed, aka behind the scenes discussions that helps all parties to streamline the process. Better to know that the city doesn't like something and make changes prior to going to staff review, as it saves time and money for everyone involved. So deals have been made, some we know, some will come out in the next few months and years.
Think I will start a new post, to let this stand as the "official" info currently available.
Last edited: