Sectorkeeper71
Well-Known Member
Could the Mickey shorts space work for Disney Jr though if they went with the AC space? That show seems much simpler to relocate
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
News Monster Inc Land Coming to Disney's Hollywood Studios
- Thread starter wdwmagic
- Start date
Surferboy567
Well-Known Member
The site that shall not be named has now doubled down on his claim that its going in animation courtyard.
Sectorkeeper71
Well-Known Member
Not a fan of said nameless site, but i really hope he’s right on this one
KDM31091
Well-Known Member
Why for any reason on earth would they need to remove a functioning attraction and multiple eateries for the coaster if they can install it in dead space on the other side of the park?
I’m sorry that’s just moronic. You’re taking away a beloved attraction that is also a great break from the heat and attracts guests yet never has a long wait due to great capacity. And you will replace it with a 90 second coaster with a 2 hour long wait, something Hollywood hardly needs more of.
I’m sorry that’s just moronic. You’re taking away a beloved attraction that is also a great break from the heat and attracts guests yet never has a long wait due to great capacity. And you will replace it with a 90 second coaster with a 2 hour long wait, something Hollywood hardly needs more of.
LSLS
Well-Known Member
They knew the backlash (hence they didn't announce it during the presentation and waited til they could just dump it online). But I disagree there is always an uproar. Most the people who are considered haters (like I am labeled) were fine with as recent as the CBJ retheme when it was announced (at least saying it made sense with the IP mandates and they were happy the bears stayed). I actually don't think many would have an issue with eliminating Dino if they added FIRST so that the park could withstand it better. I doubt you would have huge uproar over losing launch bay for this. But you are seeing iconic attractions taken out, and most don't see why they need to be when they have other MORE suitable places. I think if this was the only place left for it, people would get it a bit more (still be upset, but get it). Monsters in AC would make a TON more sense, not just because that area has nothing, but because it is close to TSL, giving you an option to build out more Pixar close together. But this is leaving that AC as a "Blue Sky" Concept that hopefully one day they decide on and fund while eliminating an iconic show that many of the people with kids now went to as kids themselves.
ednamodedarling
Well-Known Member
I would assume Muppets would run in rotation with HOP ... similarly to Walt Disney AA & Great Moments with Mr Lincoln.
SamusAranX
Well-Known Member
If they replace the Muppets section with Monstropolis, it shows Disney STILL hasn’t learned their lesson
Add. Net. Capacity. It’s not rocket science
Add. Net. Capacity. It’s not rocket science
Surferboy567
Well-Known Member
Report: Imagineers Haven't Decided Where in Hollywood Studios to Place Monsters Inc. Land Yet
A new report suggests that Walt Disney Imagineering hasn't settled on a location for Monsters Inc Land yet, but that the clock is ticking
blogmickey.com
This is such a fascinating discourse. I don't think I've ever seen a debate like this, usually it's pretty clear where things are going.
WorldExplorer
Well-Known Member
Setting aside all of reality, set aside the ruining things and terrible decisions for a moment: Completely removed from all context, the Muppets in a building clearly not made for the Muppets, trying to make a show around an existing show that keeps going off an inappropriate moments, actually sounds like a really funny idea.
But this is reality and we're in the midst of terrible decisions, so it would be awful.
There have been “debates”. Tron was a good one.Report: Imagineers Haven't Decided Where in Hollywood Studios to Place Monsters Inc. Land Yet
A new report suggests that Walt Disney Imagineering hasn't settled on a location for Monsters Inc Land yet, but that the clock is ticking
This is such a fascinating discourse. I don't think I've ever seen a debate like this, usually it's pretty clear where things are going.
Surferboy567
Well-Known Member
Remind me, where was TRON thought to have been placed? The speedway?
Surferboy567
Well-Known Member
They could truly not know though as the report states.
I think it's pretty unlikely Rock is involved if it goes in Animation Courtyard. Rock is a sit down launched coaster, this is a suspended coaster.
I wonder what happens to grand avenue if they decide against muppets as the spot. Do they just leave it as is? Or hope people don’t care as much in a few years?
Surferboy567
Well-Known Member
Leave it as is would be my guess.
Ragerunner
Well-Known Member
That seems reasonable.
That really leave 2026 as the wildcard year. While no major projects can be done by then, I think updates to Carousel of Progress and Journey to Imagination would fill in nicely for 2026.
Last edited:
If I’m being honest, if there is a way to update grand avenue while keeping
MV3D, I’d be down. I think it’s kinda bland sans muppets.
Surferboy567
Well-Known Member
I think the two options here are:
1.) Leave muppets as is
1A.) Move into animation courtyard and bulldoze Disney Jr, Launch Bay, animation building and put monsters there. Leave Rock intact.
2.) Bulldoze the entire area (plus grand avenue) and let Monsters move in.