flynnibus
Premium Member
NextGen is about elevating the baseline possibilities within the park - and doing something that can't be easily duplicated/copied by their competition.
It's like investing in computer aided design and automation while your competition is still stuck with slide rules. It's purpose is to advance theme park technology... hence 'next generation'.
FP+ itself seems like a huge reach in that it steers how people will experience the parks way too much IMO. But time will tell. Personally I'm not too wound up about FP+.. because I think it looks to be bad enough that it won't stand and will be altered. I don't really see much here that isn't adaptable or removable by the company.. so if it raises a stink, Disney should be able to adapt.
Its not like building a 200million dollar attraction or park they will have to leave in place for a decade before they can feel comfortable to rip out. With so much of it being software and policy.. they should really only be limited by costs of time and how to phase in change after people are already in the system..
It's like investing in computer aided design and automation while your competition is still stuck with slide rules. It's purpose is to advance theme park technology... hence 'next generation'.
FP+ itself seems like a huge reach in that it steers how people will experience the parks way too much IMO. But time will tell. Personally I'm not too wound up about FP+.. because I think it looks to be bad enough that it won't stand and will be altered. I don't really see much here that isn't adaptable or removable by the company.. so if it raises a stink, Disney should be able to adapt.
Its not like building a 200million dollar attraction or park they will have to leave in place for a decade before they can feel comfortable to rip out. With so much of it being software and policy.. they should really only be limited by costs of time and how to phase in change after people are already in the system..