MousDad
New Member
My god... if he actually did it....
It isn`t down to budget.
:fork::fork::fork::fork:
You mean if the schedule has been shortened, it's not because of a slashed budget, but because of something (or someone) else?
My god... if he actually did it....
It isn`t down to budget.
:fork::fork::fork::fork:
I'd like to hear more too, please.My god... if he actually did it....
It isn`t down to budget.
:fork::fork::fork::fork:
Like working 24/7Yes, there are quite a few things that can be done off site and most of those things are already done off site. Track is built off site as well as the cars. What complicates things is all the little x-factors that come into play with a major rufurb like this. First and foremost the size of track pieces must be designed to fit through a rather small space. A track section that in a new build might be able to be done in one section now might have to be broken up into 5. That makes 5 more pieces to the puzzle and 5 more things that can go wrong. On top of that you can have somewhat unpredictable site conditions that can throw a monkey wrench in even the best laid plans.
If the dates are correct one of two things has happened. Either the refurb has been scaled back or by some miracle of prefabrication and time management they have figured out how to cram an originally planned 18 month refurb into 6.
You mean if the schedule has been shortened, it's not because of a slashed budget, but because of something (or someone) else?
Varous sources put it something like this: when audio equipment was added to the trains, the change in center-of-mass put un-planned stresses on the track/supports. These periodically cracked, with spot-welds to repair it more or less nightly. At some point, the powers that be decided that enough was enough, and the opening crew was told during spin-up that they were not to open the ride that day, and later that day, they were told they were down more or less for good.I thought DL's was down that long because management wasn't prepared to fix it as soon as it finally broke. (I don't know the details of what happened there. Anything I've ever read abot it skirted around the details, but made it clear it was pretty bad, whatever it was.)
Varous sources put it something like this: when audio equipment was added to the trains, the change in center-of-mass put un-planned stresses on the track/supports. These periodically cracked, with spot-welds to repair it more or less nightly. At some point, the powers that be decided that enough was enough, and the opening crew was told during spin-up that they were not to open the ride that day, and later that day, they were told they were down more or less for good.
I don't know if this is true or not, but the ride *was* closed on very short notice at the beginning of an operating day, and as far as anyone could tell, not much happened in the building for some time after that.
Here is MousePlanet's report from that week it went down:
http://www.mouseplanet.com/articles.php?art=dl030414xx
My god... if he actually did it....
It isn`t down to budget.
:fork::fork::fork::fork:
Possibly so---but not quite as dramatic as Thunder's closure several months later.
Vice President of WDW, specifically the head suit of the MK.Who is Phil Holmes, and is this good or bad?
Vice President of WDW, specifically the head suit of the MK.
Vice President of WDW, specifically the head suit of the MK.
Was he pushing for a lengthier/costlier refurb or not? I'll assume he was pushing for a shorter refurb.
From what I have heard and understand (and what the time period indicates) there will NOT be a complete track replacement. There is some work that is going to be done on the track, but it is not a replacement. There are some truths out there in the rumors about the rehab that have been spread, but some of them are not true as well. The April to November time frame is new to me, so some of my information may be out of date, but I doubt it.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.