This is an old account, true, but until fairly recently I haven't been reading this forum, and certainly not paying attention to individual posters long enough to know that I am expected to accept their unsubstantiated word for gospel.
If others do, good for them.
Regardless, the author of the article in question is not, as much as I can tell, a poster in this forum. The post I was referring to was referencing something someone on this forum said weeks ago about the alleged meeting of executives in Orlando and using this as evidence that the article was correct in its allegations. My point was that people were reading too much into this, and indeed @
WDW1974 is now saying that he believes a lot of the original article was, in his words, "merely speculation."