The new "grass" areas are pretty much where the water was on either side of the bridge from main street to the hub.So I've been following this post for a while now and I apologize if I missed something, but does anyone have any before and after type pics? I'm having trouble remembering what the fake grass area looked like before. Thanks for any help!
So I've been following this post for a while now and I apologize if I missed something, but does anyone have any before and after type pics? I'm having trouble remembering what the fake grass area looked like before. Thanks for any help!
Large trees weren't a problem in the past, nor are they a problem at Disneyland.Just browsed through the last few pages of posts (complaints). I'm no engineer or anything, but I do have common sense. It tells me more trees, especially ones that are 20 ft tall and 20 ft wide, would hinder the viewing area of the fireworks. I know you're all going to jump on me and say it's too hot, there's plenty of space blah blah blah, but isn't the point of the hub re-development to relieve some congestion and issues with people moving around? If you put a bunch of trees around the hub, no one is going to want to sit behind them which will crowd other areas and leaving everyone complaining yet again. I can hear it now "why would they put a tree there" and "who's stupid idea was this". If you want trees and shade, there is a whole island full of them at Tom sawyer island. You could even go walk through a tree house...
Large trees weren't a problem in the past, nor are they a problem at Disneyland.
The trees don't have to be as big as they once were, but I do feel it would help artistically if they were a fair bit bigger than they have been since 2006 (?).I suppose not, but I have been there in a spot that looked good until I realized that I couldn't see the sky. Guess it was mostly my fault, but still...
I actually tend to agree with Doug. In the ideal world, WDW and the castle would look like they used to, with trees making the castle look like it's in a forest beyond main st...but with the volume of people there, what can they do?
Well, they could charge $300/day and then it wouldn't be SO crowded, but we wouldn't like that either
Ugh, that looks so good! Why don't just do this?The trees don't have to be as big as they once were, but I do feel it would help artistically if they were a fair bit bigger than they have been since 2006 (?).
The castle needs to be framed better, especially from Main Street.
As it is and will continue to look:
What I'd propose (excuse my very quick Photoshop):
Oh, like it was in 1991?The trees don't have to be as big as they once were, but I do feel it would help artistically if they were a fair bit bigger than they have been since 2006 (?).
The castle needs to be framed better, especially from Main Street, U.S.A.
Currently:
What I'd propose (excuse my very quick Photoshop):
Of course I'd much prefer something like this (I've been championing it for a while), but I'm thinking as realistically as possible.Oh, like it was in 1991?
The trees don't have to be as big as they once were, but I do feel it would help artistically if they were a fair bit bigger than they have been since 2006 (?).
The castle needs to be framed better, especially from Main Street, U.S.A.
What I'd propose (excuse my very quick Photoshop):
Do you mind?But but... I wouldn't be able to see stranger's faces projected on the castle before the fireworks!!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.