The Empress Lilly
Well-Known Member
What I wouldn't give for a few bikes parked at EPCOT and DHS. Such a perfect route to cycle...Bicycle Trail Network... 100% clean renewable energy
What I wouldn't give for a few bikes parked at EPCOT and DHS. Such a perfect route to cycle...Bicycle Trail Network... 100% clean renewable energy
With a quick and efficient means of transportation I think it would become a very popular and heavy route as a means of bypassing paying for parking at MK.TTC to DS is not a heavy traffic route.
I really don't think that catwalks take that much away from the look at all. In fact it wouldn't bother me if they chose to add them to the existing beam.What the WDW Monorail has going for it really couldn't be done today because there's no catwalk. I bet that they couldn't get away with that today. The lack of a catwalk makes it looks slim and sexy up in the sky. When you add a catwalk in it greatly diminishes the look of the Monorail (see Newark's airport monorail - it looks as bad, or nearly as bad, as an elevated train or light rail).
Yes, they couldn't even if they wanted.I'm sure all of the people on scooters due to weight issues would hop right on bikes instead.
Well, that depends. They might not have a choice in the matter.But realistically, that lot would sit across Floridian way west of the MK and transportation would still be needed from the lot to the MK entrance because it still would be at best a half mile from the MK entrance. They'd also need a bridge over the canal, massive, expensive road improvements to Floridian way all while the MK parking and tollbooth area is just finishing up a huge overhaul right now with the new overpass, etc. You don't really gain much for such an expenditure.
I've been saying this for years. I even made a diagram. Once you eliminate the need for "park & ride" you could combine the express and Epcot monorail to make it a park to park line. You could even extend the monorail line to the other parks, although that's probably a whole lot less likely now. A garage similar in size or larger than Universals or Disneylands would easily fit just west of MK and the trams can simply take the route that the pathway there currently takes.Well, that depends. They might not have a choice in the matter.
By moving the lot to the property right next to MK you eliminate the need for the express monorail and the Ferry. You can tram guests in just like they do at every other lot to a location roughly equidistant to the current bus lot on the east side of the park. A parking garage and moving walkways would work even better, but would cost a lot more to build.
From a guest standpoint, you no longer that tha 1/2 hour trek from the parking lot to the front gates.
Given the ever increasing attendance at MK, a drastic change like this might become necessary as there will be an inevitable tipping point where the monorail and the boats simply can't keep up with the volume of guests that need them. Many think that point has already been passed. After being in a few peak season fireworks dumps in the last couple of years, I would tend to agree.
I've been saying this for years. I even made a diagram. Once you eliminate the need for "park & ride" you could combine the express and Epcot monorail to make it a park to park line. You could even extend the monorail line to the other parks, although that's probably a whole lot less likely now. A garage similar in size or larger than Universals or Disneylands would easily fit just west of MK and the trams can simply take the route that the pathway there currently takes.
Most of the MK lot isn’t suitable for development.Also, if you build a parking garage by the MK, the MK parking lot becomes a pretty nice place for another park.
Except how can you park cars closer to the MK without filling in the lake? At this point it is almost impossible to change the parking style for the Magic Kingdom.
Build a new lot on unused land just west of MK.
It's "cheap" -- as in cheaper than extending the monorails and less manpower intensive than 100 buses...But watch the gondola very closely...if it’s cheap and goes off ok (I have doubts)...then you could see them becoming more of a “network”
Yep, or more hotels. You could even keep the TTC station as a new resort station.I never thought of it but in your diagram above skipping the TTC completely makes sense.
Also, if you build a parking garage by the MK, the MK parking lot becomes a pretty nice place for another park.
I like it, just in line with what @marni1971 said, make two lines out of the Park express, an MK-Epcot line, and a Epcot - HS - AK line. Even if the parking garage falls through, you can still have the MK-Epcot line stop at the existing TTC.I've been saying this for years. I even made a diagram. Once you eliminate the need for "park & ride" you could combine the express and Epcot monorail to make it a park to park line. You could even extend the monorail line to the other parks, although that's probably a whole lot less likely now. A garage similar in size or larger than Universals or Disneylands would easily fit just west of MK and the trams can simply take the route that the pathway there currently takes.
From a guest standpoint, you no longer that tha 1/2 hour trek from the parking lot to the front gates.
Given the ever increasing attendance at MK, a drastic change like this might become necessary as there will be an inevitable tipping point where the monorail and the boats simply can't keep up with the volume of guests that need them.
That half hour is actually EXACTLY by design. By staggering the exiting crowd they have eliminated mass chaos in the parking lot and the egress roads. It prevents backups on tertiary roads and the on-ramps to I4, etc. In the reverse it prevents the gates from getting overwhelmed by limiting the number of guests in the entrance place at any given time.
It sucks as a guest to have to wait for the monorail/boat then wait for the tram, or vice versa, but it makes sense. Disney had massive problems with traffic in Anaheim and they developed a system in FL that the guest thinks is about "transporting them into the fantasy" and is really about limiting throughput. One could argue the other 3 parks make do with just shuttles but the attendance numbers for the other parks don't even come close to the MK and the mass chaos that ensues post fireworks/parade/etc.
The flaw with this theory is that that limiting factor isn't any more than just the trams by themselves. Waiting in one line limits throughput just as much as waiting in 3 lines. There's still ultimately a line for the trams so there is zero net effect of limiting throughput by the monorails or ferry boats.That half hour is actually EXACTLY by design. By staggering the exiting crowd they have eliminated mass chaos in the parking lot and the egress roads. It prevents backups on tertiary roads and the on-ramps to I4, etc. In the reverse it prevents the gates from getting overwhelmed by limiting the number of guests in the entrance place at any given time.
It sucks as a guest to have to wait for the monorail/boat then wait for the tram, or vice versa, but it makes sense. Disney had massive problems with traffic in Anaheim and they developed a system in FL that the guest thinks is about "transporting them into the fantasy" and is really about limiting throughput. One could argue the other 3 parks make do with just shuttles but the attendance numbers for the other parks don't even come close to the MK and the mass chaos that ensues post fireworks/parade/etc.
This^^^By design or dumb luck?
I'm not disagreeing with the effects. I've never heard that this was all done "to fix traffic leaving the park". I've heard plenty of other reasons, not this one, though.
hasnt stopped them beforeMost of the MK lot isn’t suitable for development.
It does if your first floor could turn into a lake.hasnt stopped them before
Most of the MK lot isn’t suitable for development.
Not if you want to build a Nemo attractionIt does if your first floor could turn into a lake.
I don't know, TTC right across the street even has a basement. I've always heard there was some issue with the area that's a pond/swamp in the middle of it. I'm pretty sure it could be developed if they wanted to. I would be interested to know the issues with the land, but short of that I wouldn't count it out.It does if your first floor could turn into a lake.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.