discos
Well-Known Member
Aladdin's new outfit looks similar to the Prince Ali costume used in the Broadway ProductionAladdins new look, people said hes only gonna wear this look at Epcot
Aladdin's new outfit looks similar to the Prince Ali costume used in the Broadway ProductionAladdins new look, people said hes only gonna wear this look at Epcot
Why was it bound to change? What am I missing?
Um, not a dig against you, but against Disney management: aren't they the ones that made her costume in the first place?!Because
a) her costume is too revealing (whether you agree or not, that's what Disney seems to think.
I think Ariel's costume is safe and that the change happened to Jasmine based off of the culture of where the story takes place.Because
a) her costume is too revealing (whether you agree or not, that's what Disney seems to think)
b) they gave themselves the liberty of changing the other princesses oufits to ones that aren't seen in the movies, and so they basically gave themselves permission to cover up Jasmine
c) other posters who are "in the know" have said that Jasmine's costume would change
I don't neccessarily agree with the change or like the new costume. Perhaps "bound to change" wasn't the best wording. What I meant is: the points I listed above led this to be no surprise for me.
A note on point a)... I guess Ariel still has a rather revealing costume. Wonder if hers will change.
Um, not a dig against you, but against Disney management: aren't they the ones that made her costume in the first place?!
I think Ariel's costume is safe and that the change happened to Jasmine based off of the culture of where the story takes place.
I still believe Ariel is safe. I think this was more about the specific culture Jasmine comes from.Well, I'm late to the party on this one, but yeah, that's no Jasmine. The picture later of "Aladdin and Jasmine".... yeah, not them. There's good character look-alikes and then there's what was pictured.
I guess the Jasmine we're seeing now is from Family Guy's mockery of Aladdin 4: Jafar may need glasses, lol.
I mean, you watch the movies and then go to the parks expecting something close to the character. These are way out in left field.
I guess the next step is to de-clam Ariel?
It's probably nothing more than a few tourists who were "offended" honestly. Instead of Disney sticking up for themselves, they folded and put an outfit on Jasmine that has never existed anywhere in her being.I still believe Ariel is safe. I think this was more about the specific culture Jasmine comes from.
I've heard from a Jasmine friend of mine, that people ask all the time why sheIt's probably nothing more than a few tourists who were "offended" honestly. Instead of Disney sticking up for themselves, they folded and put an outfit on Jasmine that has never existed anywhere in her existence.
Ariel might be ok because well, to put it the way it is, she's a white girl with red hair that fills out her clam shells.
Remember, we live in a country where there are members of Congress who are in favor of bombing the fictional city of Agrabah....
People like that make meI've heard from a Jasmine friend of mine, that people ask all the time why sheisn'twasn't covered up more.
I've heard from a Jasmine friend of mine, that people ask all the time why she isn't covered up more.
The rest of the frustration I can understand, but I fully support the covering of the midriff.I completely agree that a change was needed but this is just a big NO. nonono. This does not look like jasmine at all.
It's Disney. This is the place where the cartoons come into reality. The expectation is that you will see a character performer that mirrors what you see on tv. Seeing this Jasmine is not that. Reality vs Fiction. Disney is the escape from Reality. I mean, c'mon now, Tinkerbell doesn't have that much to her costume... So Tink and Ariel better find ways to cover up... but then again, it's a cultural issue (which wasn't prevalent at the time of the making of the movie). So the American white girls will remain the way they are because, well, Murica and Jasmine will change because someone cried to a lawyer...
Which I have heard is one of the reasons you do not see characters like Esmeralda walking around Disneyland.No. The accuracy of your escapism is NOT worth exacerbating the sexual harrassment these girls have to put up with on a daily basis just to make y'all happy.
No. The accuracy of your escapism is NOT worth exacerbating the sexual harrassment these girls have to put up with on a daily basis just to make y'all happy.
It's a different type of offense. It's not that we see more skin, it's that in the area where Aladdin takes place, women are expected to cover up their bodies. I don't get the need for change, but that is the key reason for it.Actually, thinking about it... there is one character that they should look at before Jasmin...
How about Tarzan? He comes out on occasion for training and such, and you guessed it... it's a loin cloth... C'mon Disney, you can let a guy dress like an ape man wearing nothing but a rag over his stuff, but Jasmin's a problem?
Guess the offended people liked looking at Tarzan's total package, lol, so that was A-OK in their eyes...
The need for change is because more than likely, someone got offended, called a lawyer and it went somewhere. There are more tasteful ways to dress Jasmine that fit the movie.It's a different type of offense. It's not that we see more skin, it's that in the area where Aladdin takes place, women are expected to cover up their bodies. I don't get the need for change, but that is the key reason for it.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.