Do you know how popular Motion was?And which one of those two is immensely more popular?
You keep arguing your point of view with little to back it up.
Do you know how popular Motion was?And which one of those two is immensely more popular?
I'd even go as fas as saying in the original EPCOT Center, WoM and Imagination were probably the two most popular rides with the longest linesDo you know how popular Motion was?
You keep arguing your point of view with little to back it up.
World of Motion was among the first of the future world attractions to close. That’s usually an indication of popularity. Test Track still draws one of the longest lines in Epcot despite being decades old now.Do you know how popular Motion was?
You keep arguing your point of view with little to back it up.
It closed due to GM having to follow the contract which stipulated any re negotiated contract with GM -which this was - had to be for a new ride, not an overhaul.World of Motion was among the first of the future world attractions to close. That’s usually an indication of popularity. Test Track still draws one of the longest lines in Epcot despite being decades old now.
Expedition Everest was a far better return on investment than any of the franchise mandate attractions built since its opening.The harsh reality that nobody wants to face is that IP attractions usually attract more crowds than non-IP rides. Yes, plenty of non-IP rides are very popular. But Disney is benefiting from this IP craze
I can’t prove a negative. I’ll give you that. But I’ve never heard anyone suggest Imagination have a 2019 iteration. All I hear is about how we should bring Dreamfinder back and relive the glory days. And a park like epcot isn’t exactly possible anymore. We live in a post internet and cellphone world. Epcot would be hard pressed to find technology to display that I can’t find on a google search. Epcot needs a new approach which includes IPs and thrill rides. The harsh reality that nobody wants to face is that IP attractions usually attract more crowds than non-IP rides. Yes, plenty of non-IP rides are very popular. But Disney is benefiting from this IP craze
But unfortunately you know were probably not getting that. I mean Figment is a iconic character that deserves a presence in the park but I don’t see today’s Disney rebuilding it to today’s standards.How about a 2019 iteration with the Dreamfinder?
We don't all want Epcot Center from the 1980's resurrected as it was then - some of us just aren't so creatively constrained and IP obsessed that we believe there is only one way to improve the parks.
Uh... Flight of Passage caused double digit attendance increases two years in a row?Expedition Everest was a far better return on investment than any of the franchise mandate attractions built since its opening.
I don’t think it’s possible in terms of today’s technology and today’s culture. First, the interest among the general public isn’t there. And more importantly , Disney can’t consistently update epcot every year which is what would need to happen for it to remain relevant. And in an age of internet and smart phones, Disney would be hard pressed to find brand new innovative technology that I couldn’t find with ten minutes on google. It would be very difficult to amaze the general public at this point.It closed due to GM having to follow the contract which stipulated any re negotiated contract with GM -which this was - had to be for a new ride, not an overhaul.
Test Track was planned from 1992. I can testify how popular Motion still was in July 1993.
It also helps Test Track has around half the capacity that Motion had, even more so in a park that in the 90s had much more overall capacity than today.
Did you still want to discuss a new old Epcot using todays tech?
And it cost several times more to get each of those new guests into the park. Better to spend $100 than $500 to attract a new customer.Uh... Flight of Passage caused double digit attendance increases two years in a row?
There was also nothing stopping them from continuing on without a sponsor, or negotiating a new deal with with a different company.It closed due to GM having to follow the contract which stipulated any re negotiated contract with GM -which this was - had to be for a new ride, not an overhaul.
Well I’d still wanna see numbers on that claim. Without a doubt Pandora was more expensive but Animal Kingdom is still riding high on its success.And it cost several times more to get each of those new guests into the park. Better to spend $100 than $500 to attract a new customer.
How about a 2019 iteration with the Dreamfinder?
We don't all want Epcot Center from the 1980's resurrected as it was then - some of us just aren't so creatively constrained and IP obsessed that we believe there is only one way to improve the parks.
Out of pure curiosity, because WoM is the one attraction I never researched as extensively as others... What was the popularity numbers towards the attractions later years in comparison to Test Track?Do you know how popular Motion was?
You keep arguing your point of view with little to back it up.
The only reason Disney benefits from the IP craze is because they are pushing it. Disney always had IP based rides. However, there was a good balance. The balance is tilting now towards all IP attractions. An Epcot Center like park can still be relevant. Seeing new technology in person is completely different than looking at it on a computer screen. That’s a totally different issue.I can’t prove a negative. I’ll give you that. But I’ve never heard anyone suggest Imagination have a 2019 iteration. All I hear is about how we should bring Dreamfinder back and relive the glory days. And a park like epcot isn’t exactly possible anymore. We live in a post internet and cellphone world. Epcot would be hard pressed to find technology to display that I can’t find on a google search. Epcot needs a new approach which includes IPs and thrill rides. The harsh reality that nobody wants to face is that IP attractions usually attract more crowds than non-IP rides. Yes, plenty of non-IP rides are very popular. But Disney is benefiting from this IP craze
What's your rationale for saying that?The only reason Disney benefits from the IP craze is because they are pushing it.
What's your rationale for saying that?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.