Bismuth
Active Member
Gosh, I hope this is speculation and not true anymore.Judging by the direction things have been going lately. It seems so, sadly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a5e8/7a5e80f7b48c588b184c6616a76ba94b98cadc59" alt="Frown :( :("
Gosh, I hope this is speculation and not true anymore.Judging by the direction things have been going lately. It seems so, sadly.
I KNEW it was political infighting! WDI and Team Disney were dead wrong about Figment and Dreamfinder and they seem very spiteful and unwilling to give the people what they want regarding these characters.
Figment once had a male personality. Ron Schneider can tell you that.
Some degenerate at Disney decided to feminize the character, particularly in merchandise- not so much the attraction.
Figment was made to be bratty and obnoxious in another sad twist.
You want your Figment back?
Enjoy!!
Agreed... I really don’t understand the weird anti-feminine/ anti-gay conclusion posts he’s making. It’s *really*, *really* bizarre or why he’s accusing me of having an “agenda” all because I made a reference to Pinocchio & Pooh, like that has anything to do with gender or sexuality. Hateful too. Not sure where he’s getting this nonsense about Figment merchandise pushing some kind agenda. Any gender and sexuality can enjoy a Disney character. Not to mention, there’s nothing wrong with showing representation in merchandise. People are people. There’s no need to be so discriminatory and hateful against others simply for being a different gender or having a different sexual orientation.Dude, your posts have been really, really creepy. Please cut it out.
People on this forum seem to be obsessed with identity politics but in the same breath accuse other people of doing same thing they are doing.Agreed... I really don’t understand the weird anti-feminine/ anti-gay conclusion posts he’s making. It’s *really*, *really* bizarre or why he’s accusing me of having an “agenda” all because I made a reference to Pinocchio & Pooh, like that has anything to do with gender or sexuality. Hateful too. Not sure where he’s getting this nonsense about Figment merchandise pushing some kind agenda. Any gender and sexuality can enjoy a Disney character. Not to mention, there’s nothing wrong with showing representation in merchandise. People are people. There’s no need to be so discriminatory and hateful against others simply for being a different gender or having a different sexual orientation.
Figment’s supposed to represent the childlike curiosity, innocence, and creativity in *all* of us, regardless of our gender or sexual identity.
More than 11 years now i’m afraid. It’s now been 19 years sadly since that travesty of a ‘Honey, I Shrunk’ IP ride replaced the original 1983 masterpiece. The current, insulting, mean spirited 2002 band-aid fix version “with Figment” ‘s now lasted 17 years, 1 year longer than the original did in it’s 16 year run. So, SO depressing.So yeah.....
How about that Imagination Pavillion, huh...?
Who could have ever foreseen it would be talked about in this type of context come 2019.
Eleven years after the removal of the superior Original incarnation.
Eleven flippin' years of mediocre ' attempts' to try to capture a mere glimmer of what resided there prior to removal.
Back when the Pavilion, as a whole, functioned as a entire cohesive presentation ( JII ride, Image Works, Magic Journeys ).
Back when the Imagination Pavillion was, you know, actually 'imaginative'.
-
Do you think there will be a surprise announcement regarding this pavilion at the D23? It seems like it’s the one area not getting any attention.That is indeed quite depressing.
Has it really been that long...?
My desire to erase the memory of that horrible ( yet thankfully brief ) period between 1999 and 2001 must be working since I can't recall the correct amount of years since the Original was desecrated.
My goodness.
A far more disturbing reality indeed.
-
So yeah.....
How about that Imagination Pavillion, huh...?
Who could have ever foreseen it would be talked about in this type of context come 2019.
Eleven years after the removal of the superior Original incarnation.
Eleven flippin' years of mediocre ' attempts' to try to capture a mere glimmer of what resided there prior to removal.
Back when the Pavilion, as a whole, functioned as a entire cohesive presentation ( JII ride, Image Works, Magic Journeys ).
Back when the Imagination Pavillion was, you know, actually 'imaginative'.
-
What kind of gets me the most is the feeling that we won't see that kind of seamlessly integrated pavilion experience again. When my family would go to WDW during my childhood my parents always knew that we could go to the Imagination pavilion and spend multiple hours in a place all of us could enjoy; the ride was genuinely fun for everyone, it ran a decent length of time, it was a constant loader so the line was rarely too arduous a wait, the Image Works allowed for a chance for kids to let off some steam and had some genuinely interesting tech for its time, and then heading right down to the Magic Eye theater was the capper on the experience.
In other words, you got a really great narrative (ride --> apply what the ride shows in the Image Works --> experience the ride's thesis in the movie theater), you got a place that appealed to almost everyone, and, at bare minimum, you could have over 2 hours in air conditioning during a humid central Florida day.
Almost none of that is being emphasized now. There's little to no integration between rides and some kind of follow-up experience, which defeats the idea of the pavilion setup; the emphasis we seem to get instead is to finish one ride, get a few minutes in the gift shop, then hurry to the next one. There's far less concern about crowd control: as we get fewer Omnimovers, lose the moving theater shows, etc., we're often getting lower capacity rides, instead, which in turn become shorter experiences once we actually board them.
What kind of gets me the most is the feeling that we won't see that kind of seamlessly integrated pavilion experience again. When my family would go to WDW during my childhood my parents always knew that we could go to the Imagination pavilion and spend multiple hours in a place all of us could enjoy... and then heading right down to the Magic Eye theater was the capper on the experience.
God, I would perish if that was trueWouldn't that be something if they were hinting at the rainbow tunneling returning but also with a meet and greet?
It was the music with the visuals that did it for me. I was 13 and was freaked (in a good way). Disney will never be that bold again.Magic Journeys was definitely a weird one haha. But from what I've heard (being born in '95 and missing it), it was pretty innovative and a spectacle for its time!
to you perhaps...yes it was odd...but it was supposed to be, but "deeply unsettling" is a bit much...lolAs a child, I was deathly afraid of Magic Journeys (during its MK run) and it's melange of coke-dream scenes. It was by no means something the whole family could enjoy. Magic Journeys was pure nightmare fuel of epic proportions.
The rest of the original pavilion? Well designed and integrated thematically. But Magic Journeys was... deeply unsettling.
Magic Journeys was definitely a weird one haha. But from what I've heard (being born in '95 and missing it), it was pretty innovative and a spectacle for its time!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.