Kman101
Well-Known Member
This is actually my very first post having read Martin for years now. I for one see it the way you do Kman101.
Martin's point re Epcot is a lot stronger in Future World, which as originally conceived and implemented was an amazing idea and truly inspiring and educational. The World Showcase even as originally conceived is a bad joke -- the idea that Americans (largely Americans) should believe that the UK is anything like that pavilion, or that any of the countries are anything like those pavilions, is laughable from day 1 and the whole concept is sort of cheapening in my view. Therefore turning the World Showcase into a sort of awesome "International Land" extension of the Magic Kingdom where each pavilion is linked up with a Disney film that is based directly (Mary Poppins; Rat) or loosely (Frozen) in the same culture, is actually quite cool. And if there were space for this at the MK it would fit right in, and even as a blank slate idea sounds great. I can easily talk myself into thinking this is better than the original World Showcase concept.
So I end up basically agreeing with Martin that Guardians and Nemo are sad for Future World, but disagreeing that Frozen, Mary Poppins, Rat, are bad for the World Showcase.
I think Big Hero 6 could work in Future World, as could Inside Out (if Inside Out had been Cranium Command's replacement, that is, I don't really feel the need for a full Inside Out ride, a theater show feels like a good choice for it.) It's about the only IP I'd want there that could somewhat, IMO, of course, fit the park if they so insist on IPs, at least use ones that can truly fit if you tried. I agree Guardians isn't the right choice. Nemo could have been better implemented, the IP isn't necessarily the problem here, but I know for some it is. I don't exactly feel they're necessary but I also don't have an issue if they use them well, which in a lot of cases, they don't. I agree that Future World should be mostly IP free.
But with World Showcase, I take no issue with Mary or Rat or Coco (too bad it's not happening at the moment). I take more issue with Frozen because it's not set exactly in Norway, if it were a Scandinavia pavilion and (or if Frozen was actually said to take place in Norway, but even then I sort of resist the whole 'princesses' in the WS for some reason), and if Frozen Ever After was built behind or off to the side, I'd be a little more accepting. A little. But I'd prefer a Vikings ride similar to Pirates at the pavilion. I guess I give Mary and Rat and Coco a pass because they're set in where they're being placed. Frozen was a knee jerk reaction and an attempt at a quick fix to get a hot IP into the park. I don't feel the same about Mary, Rat and hopefully one day Coco. I know if I support some I should support Frozen but I can't totally.