Guardians of the Galaxy Mission Breakout announced for Disney California Adventure

[Ismael Flores]

Haven't we heard of cast members already riding? So they must be doing some previews.

From my understanding sing they are allowing some castmembers to ride. I also heard that even while this is going people are still hearing hammers and workers trying to finish the project while working long hours

 

[MisterPenguin]

From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeered at him. ‘Get out of here, baldy!’ they said. ‘Get out of here, baldy!’ He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the LORD. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys.

2 Kings 2:23-2

Lesson: Don't jeer at the CBJ.

 

[2351metalcloud]

In Hong Kong they added Mystic Manor and Big Grizzly Mountain. Shanghai opened with Roaring Rapids but it's been sparse hear since EE.

This place seems like it will not have any ip that first debuted outside the park when it opens. Does this count as a theme park, resort, both, or neither?

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Villages_Nature

disneyandmore.blogspot.com/2016/06/disneyland-paris-villages-nature.html

 

[No Name]

This place seems like it will not have any ip that first debuted outside the park when it opens. Does this count as a theme park, resort, both, or neither?

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Villages_Nature

disneyandmore.blogspot.com/2016/06/disneyland-paris-villages-nature.html

It's a woodsy getaway resort that's majority-owned and operated by a company called Center Parcs.

This company has over 20 of these places; you can see them listed at the bottom of this page http://www.centerparcs.com/gb-en?gclid=CN2xn4bz_9MCFVuBswodPEUO_A
While each resort is somewhat different, they all follow the same general formula. A look at the activities page on one of the resort's sites should give you a solid idea.

My point is, Disney simply has some ownership in this new one, Villages Nature, probably because it's near Disneyland Paris. This isn't their idea, and I imagine the Disney name won't have any presence here. If so, very very minimal.

 

[Cesar R M]

Why the need to judge her posts?



Anyone? I'm not sure I can always resist sarcasm.

I recommend you to reread the entire conversation. because its clear you missed a huge bunch.

 

[Cesar R M]

...And now it has none. Oh well.

at least it got a rocket raccoon AA.

 

[Cesar R M]

I disagree. If Walt Disney asked what people want to see at Disneyland, he would have gotten requests for things that are already at other amusement parks of the time. It took thinking outside of the box to create POTC or the HM. No one would ever request that kind of thing. Just look at our own responses to that question. Most forum members would respond with bring back something that use to exist instead of something complete new and outside of the box.

Disney should never listen to us. They should be creative and think outside the hot IP box.

Pretty sure now they are only listening to cash registers.

 

[Cesar R M]

So the ride is outdated because the IP is outdated? What a terribly poor thought.
A great attraction thrives on its own merit, and doesn't benefit from be carried on the shoulders of the latest and greatest franchise.

ToT is/was one of those. In fact, it's such a good ride that many people who've never been to a Disney park know of the Tower of Terror. It's thrived on its own merit. Similarly, hardly anyone knows what Song of the South is, but Splash Mountain is a popular ride. These rides have become their own IP.

By your logic, I guess Space Mountain, Thunder Mountain, the Haunted Mansion, the Matterhorn, the Jungle Cruise, and, Soarin' are all dated, since they don't have any latest and greatest movie IP. They're definitely NOT among the most popular rides... no... of course not!

I wonder how long until we see THE ROCK in the Jungle Cruise.

 

[Disney Irish]

I wonder how long until we see THE ROCK in the Jungle Cruise.

There's another thread for that, I suggest you go read it and comment over there.

 

[ReadySetDisney]

Not sure if this has already been posted.
From @TheChrisGlass on Twitter.

https://twitter.com/TheChrisGlass/status/866086584671719424

 

[Deleted member 107043]

Not sure if this has already been posted.
From @TheChrisGlass on Twitter.
View attachment 206232
https://twitter.com/TheChrisGlass/status/866086584671719424

Huh? Wha?

What's the graphic supposed to convey and how does it tell the story of the attraction to those who might be unfamiliar with it? Looks hastily thrown together. I don't get it.

 

[Californian Elitist]

Not sure if this has already been posted.
From @TheChrisGlass on Twitter.
View attachment 206232
https://twitter.com/TheChrisGlass/status/866086584671719424

I actually like the poster.

 

[Curious Constance]

I don't care for it. The only part I like is the shadow of the Collector in the background.

 

[yookeroo]

I recommend you to reread the entire conversation. because its clear you missed a huge bunch.

Naaah. I don't think I'm going to do that. As much as I'd like the opportunity to judge some posts, I think I'll pass. There's a whole lot there I don't really feel the need to reread (especially since most of it will be slightly reworded and posted again soon enough).

 

[dweezil78]

Looks cool enough to me... Most attraction posters don't get too deep into story, just a few iconic images from the attraction to pull you in. Can't say I was even expecting a poster for this!

 

[sedati]

The poster is OK, but that doesn't look like Drax at all.

 

[jaxonp]

When are those AP preview events?

 

[Mouse3268]

The poster is OK, but that doesn't look like Drax at all.

It's closer to how he looks in the comics:

 

[mickEblu]

I like the poster except for those tentacle things.

 

[britain]

It matches the flat retro look of the DCA 2.0 attraction posters, but unfortunately pales (literally) in comparison to the pop rainbow movie posters.