jt04
Well-Known Member
Hey @jt04, sorry to point this out, but you're running out of excuses on the Space Mountain screwup. They didn't want to put a new coaster in that building because they want something that caters to everyone? The newer, better Space at DL that everyone loves has a 40" height requirement; the WDW version of Space has a 44" height requirement. WDW could have put the exact same coaster in and lowered the height requirement, making it more accessible to everyone. Don't even try to say that's not true, because nobody regulates like California and they still got it down to 40" over there.
So it wasn't to shift money to FLE, and it wasn't because a new one would be too thrilling... maybe they just didn't care enough to do it right?
Maybe someday some retired Imagineer will give us the real story. Until then we have to speculate.
What is not debateable is that whatever happened occured over the transition of the restructuring of park management.
I just threw out the idea that it could be possible they had decided it was too extreme for the MK. You have made a good case that may not be the case. No need to be hostile about it. We are here to discuss as this is a forum for that purpose.
So, I am still left with the idea they just did not want to lose the capacity that two tracks offer because they anticipated all the refurbs that were necessary. Perhaps you could compare the capacity of each ride and prove or disprove my theory. Then we are one more step towards the truth.
Even if you are right and it was just a total TDO fiasco it really is not important now as that management structure no longer exists. No sense crying ove spilled milk. I mean it really is time to move on don't you think?