Wilt Dasney
Well-Known Member
As long as you're not from Iran. :animwink:For all those that say they support the right to bear arms...does this mean I can start work on that nuclear warhead?
As long as you're not from Iran. :animwink:For all those that say they support the right to bear arms...does this mean I can start work on that nuclear warhead?
Sorry if this has been brought up, I'm too lazy to read the whole thread.
But how about tasers? I can understand why they'd want a gun, because rough customers come to Disney a lot, but I think only security guards should have guns. I think it would be frair if CMs could have tasers.
Just curious, why does Disney have the right to dispute a public law? If every other company in Florida has to uphold the right to carry a concealed weapon in car why not Disney?
I think that is the worst idea ever said on these message boards. Ever.Sorry if this has been brought up, I'm too lazy to read the whole thread.
But how about tasers? I can understand why they'd want a gun, because rough customers come to Disney a lot, but I think only security guards should have guns. I think it would be frair if CMs could have tasers.
I think that is the worst idea ever said on these message boards. Ever.
The entire idea.Which part? Security guards with the only guns or CM's with tasers?
The tasers are only for use on the Brazilian Tour Groups. I established that last year.
:lol:
Call me old school but, I think everybody should be packing.
People would think twice of doing something rash if everybody carried a gun.
If not, it would be an ideal way to weed out the stupid people.
The threat of force helps keep people in line.
How about Face Characters getting cattle prods?I think that is the worst idea ever said on these message boards. Ever.
There are many valid arguments to this issue on both sides. You are not going to come up with the answer in three paragraphs.Not having read the ENITIRE thread, but I swear, some pro-gun people act as if they live in the middle of a war zone. The odds that the average person will need a gun for protection are lower in places with gun bans, and having one may end up being worse than not having one. That said the odds that the average person will need a gun for protection in places that allow guns isn't much higher than without. Either way the odds of the average person needing a gun for protection are pretty low. Arming "innocent" people isn't going to make anyone safer. It may cause petty crime to decrease, but won't have much affect on intentional violent crime (in other words, a mugger most likely wouldn't kill you unless provoked, so might not mug you if he thinks you are armed. But if you are specifically targeted, it won't stop him).
Pro-gun people act as if in the good 'ol days people walked around packing heat...well it was illegal at the founding of our country so it should be now. We had no national military...the average citizens needed weapons in case the country to went to war or there was an uprising. They had the added benefit of protecting ones home and hunting for food. The idea that you need to travel around the country with one is ridiculous, and you most certainly don't need to bring one with you to work.
Yes there are bad people out there. No gun bans won't stop them from using guns. But ordinary citizens cannot be trusted to do what is right. Unfortunately there are bad people in this world who are going to always do what they do. Arming the citizenry isn't going to stop them. How long before we hear about teachers shooting students in Texas because they were reaching for a cell phone but the teacher thought it was a gun?
You sure this is what you want? I can barely keep up with my keys most days. :lol: :shrug:Call me old school but, I think everybody should be packing.
There are many valid arguments to this issue on both sides. You are not going to come up with the answer in three paragraphs.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.