News Disney Not Renewing Great Movie Ride Sponsorship Deal with TCM ; Attraction to Close

Kman101

Well-Known Member
One of my least favorite attractions on property

For me too. I've done it once, well twice because the gun wasn't working the first time ... lol

I just don't really care for shooter games, though I know many do. At least Buzz and MiB don't come across as lazy, with screens on some plywood in a warehouse.
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
Yes, it was where little Mermaid is now right? Such a strange show, why would they not use muppet puppets? My point was when the GMR closes there will be no more original day attractions at DHS.
It was an unplanned, rushed show to quickly boost park capacity. In a large theatre normal sized puppets would look like dots.

It was bizarre but strangely entertaining. And proof the monorail did go to the Studios.
 

OSUPhantom

Well-Known Member
While I love the idea of a Mickey attraction and it's certainly fitting at the Studios, it just seems like both these attractions could exist. There's no reason to have one when you could have both (besides the money that could be saved). For a park which has long be criticized for having too few attractions, seems counter productive to merely replace an exist one rather than creating another experience.
 

wannabeBelle

Well-Known Member
While I love the idea of a Mickey attraction and it's certainly fitting at the Studios, it just seems like both these attractions could exist. There's no reason to have one when you could have both (besides the money that could be saved). For a park which has long be criticized for having too few attractions, seems counter productive to merely replace an exist one rather than creating another experience.
I believe @marni1971 i felt the same way. I cant see how two attractions wouldn't be a good thing, especially a really cool Mickey attraction! Marie
 

HMF

Well-Known Member
While I love the idea of a Mickey attraction and it's certainly fitting at the Studios, it just seems like both these attractions could exist. There's no reason to have one when you could have both (besides the money that could be saved). For a park which has long be criticized for having too few attractions, seems counter productive to merely replace an exist one rather than creating another experience.
How dare you bring logic and reason into Disney's long-term planning.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom