Kman101
Well-Known Member
The Impressions theatre should stay. As things stand. If it happens.
That's nice to hear. You'd think they'd look for any excuse to get rid of it.
The Impressions theatre should stay. As things stand. If it happens.
Eh, I am guessing its a fairly cheap attraction to maintain and staff so if they don't need the space, why not keep it? Its a beautiful film.That's nice to hear. You'd think they'd look for any excuse to get rid of it.
Eh, I am guessing its a fairly cheap attraction to maintain and staff so if they don't need the space, why not keep it? Its a beautiful film.
I once asked Martin about the pieces of land above Small World and Beast's Castle regarding future expansion in another topic. I marked a bunch of areas in red on an overhead map of the park and he went over what can be used-
http://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads/potential-land-for-future-magic-kingdom-expansions.907381/
http://i.imgur.com/BYCmT18.png
The land left of the retention pond has parking areas and some buildings. The land to the right is apparently swamp land. And using either would require working around Magic Kingdom Dr, either by a tunnel or overhead bridge (the Utilidors would need to be taken into account as well). Unless rerouting the road itself is possible (which I wouldn't assume).
Neither are designated expansion plots apparently. I guess they could find a way to use the land if they wanted, but I doubt they would.
A permit was filed a couple years ago to build a new storm water retention pond on the land behind Small World, but for some reason this was never built.
I'm almost positive that you can't answer this (protecting sources and all, and that's okay ), but would it be a clone of the Paris attraction? And would it take up the entire expansion space? I would like to see another country in the WS someday, and I'm still a little peeved that there is all of that space behind the Sommerhus that isn't being used.Because it's looking like the BatB ride in Epcot is loosing to Rat.
I believe it would, inside anyway, and no it wouldn't.I'm almost positive that you can't answer this (protecting sources and all, and that's okay ), but would it be a clone of the Paris attraction? And would it take up the entire expansion space?.
He's risking his reputation by being the spokesperson for probably the most controversial project in WDI History.
Thanks!I believe it would, inside anyway, and no it wouldn't.
In keeping with the aesthetic of the France pavilion, I do hope Ratatouille will be the attraction. BatB would not look great inside a modern French atmosphere
Something tells me that would change if the live action films does gangbusters moneyBecause it's looking like the BatB ride in Epcot is loosing to Rat.
Something tells me that would change if the live action films does gangbusters money
What's wrong with rat ride? I thought it got pretty good reviews from those who have seen it. Isn't it considered an E ticket? Besides what if they went with BatB and the dark ride was about on par with LM
I'll take the ride we know is pretty good.
Yes. If we must have IP, at least this one fits. It's actually set in Paris and I feel the film makes a pointed statement on the beauty of Paris.I feel that they would probably clone the upcoming ride set to open in Tokyo. Which very well could be a vastly superior attraction to Ratatouille. But the Rat would be less of a thematic break for World Showcase and the France pavilion, imho. So my vote is for Rat.
The B+B ride will be LPS.Besides what if they went with BatB and the dark ride was about on par with LM.
Regarding B&TB vs R for the France spot, from what I know/ believe (a matter of preference) the B&TB ride is much, much better, however, the R ride is a much, much, better fit. It does (as Martin has said) seem that Rat is winning, however, as suggested, if the movie does very well, I wouldn't count out B&TB just yet.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.