WDW1974
Well-Known Member
Hardly.
You are the Raymond Reddington of the fan community.
(Just need to get you one of them fancy hats...)
I take that as the highest compliment. Thanks!!!
I wonder how I'd look in one of his hats.
Hardly.
You are the Raymond Reddington of the fan community.
(Just need to get you one of them fancy hats...)
I'm skeptical that Universal's owners have "a passion for theme parks". I think it's probably more accurate that they see it as a growth market for them where they can get significant returns by investing money. It probably helped inspire them that Hogsmeade opened up soon after Comcast purchased Universal and they saw the significant increase in revenues that could be had by building up the existing theme parks.
This has been a work in progress since Marvel Was aquired by the Walt Disney Co. It's not much of a rumor that eventually the power of Disney's Legal Team will buy out the rights to a Marvel Theme Park.
The characters were a vinyl overlay. It is believed that they were removed to paint the pylons and that the characters will be returned with new vinyl overlaysOn Miceage's site they show that small metorite strike section on the Island was painted recently and the characters were removed...
What it looked like before...
He drew some nice crowds last year and it is a studio park.The most intriguing nugget i've seen in this thread is about a potential Jimmy Fallon attraction. A rather limiting IP, and one that would be very odd for a theme park.
The Fallon thing is is rumored to be a Soarin' style flight simulator somehow involving Rockefeller Center and possibly a Tina Fey connection.So? Fallon's popular. How would that make a good theme park attraction? Of course fans would come to his shows.
The most intriguing nugget i've seen in this thread is about a potential Jimmy Fallon attraction. A rather limiting IP, and one that would be very odd for a theme park.
They barely promote the Marvel connection.
It's supposedly going to be a Soarin'-like tour of New York city hosted by Fallon. It's...different, to say the least.
If by "barely promote the Marvel connection" you mean "uses Spider-Man and Hulk in nearly every piece of marketing they have", then yes.
If by "barely promote the Marvel connection" you mean "uses Spider-Man and Hulk in nearly every piece of marketing they have", then yes.
The contract actually requires them to use Marvel in a certain portion of their marketing.
actually... I mostly see good 'ol Harry these days
Wow. That does not sound good. And I'm a fan of Fallon and Fey.The Fallon thing is is rumored to be a Soarin' style flight simulator somehow involving Rockefeller Center and possibly a Tina Fey connection.
So more confused?
The most intriguing nugget i've seen in this thread is about a potential Jimmy Fallon attraction. A rather limiting IP, and one that would be very odd for a theme park.
He drew some nice crowds last year and it is a studio park.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.