Exactly. Disney will eventually agree with universal that they can use Marvel because they own Marvel anyways. Universal will be allowed to keep its current island and can expand but only at said IOA and not any where else. My sources are Shareholder meetings and confidential Walt Disney Co. Meetings on the subject. Disney and Universal wont be making any plans anytime soon but don't forget how Disney now owns Marvel. It be like if Warner Brothers added a new ThemePark, they could build there own Wizarding World of Harry Potter because the Brothers Warner Own the Film and to an extant most of the World Wide Publishing rights to JK Rowlings Harry Potter. But no ones stupid enough to do anything with that it has to many complications legally for anyone to ever hurt a competitor even if they own theCompany to which the theme park land is themedIt's not much of a rumor because a number of reliable sources have said that not only is Uni not giving up the contract but will be expanding the Marvel presence in IOA.
To be fair, both parks have a lot to fix before they're "complete".Yes. The interesting thing comes when the two parks are "complete", the fifth resort is open (next year), and the water park is complete (2017). After that there will be little to no expansion room left in the existing resort. Are they content to stay there? Or are they really going to swing for the fences?
Ok, most of that list aren't actual problems and won't be addressed.To be fair, both parks have a lot to fix before they're "complete".
IOA:
the Doom/Carnage/arcade area
fixing up Hulk
sprucing up Storm Force
raising MSHI's overall aesthetic to Potter levels
the Toon Lagoon front area (Comic Strip Lane, Dudley, the Theater, the carnival games)
Toon Lagoon's purpose (possibly a revamp/retheme)
Discovery Center's datedness
the remainder of the Trikes plot
JPRA in general
FJ's showbuilding intrusion upon JP
DC in general
LC's purpose
Seuss Trolley's 40" height requirement
Green Eggs and Ham
the plot next to Cat
Cat's datedness and 36" height requirement
no real non-stunt related shows
lack of all-ages attractions
lack of nighttime entertainment
lack of smaller, more intimate experiences (A and B tickets)
lack of indoor attractions (only 4 in the entire park)
USF:
lack of cohesiveness in Production Central/entrance area
Shrek's datedness
HRRR's lack of theming/intrusion upon USF's skyline
Twister's datedness
Major upgrades for ROTM
Disaster's datedness/unreliability
Fear Factor's existence
Major upgrades/revamp for MIB: AA
expansion into the mystery plot
KidZone revamp
Major upgrades for E.T.
E.T.'s 34" height requirement
T2's datedness
Lack of a water-based attraction
Lack of non-screen based attractions
Lack of all-ages attractions
Before all of this gets resolved, it should take 7-10 years to get all of it accomplished. Most of it is minor, so possibly 6-8 years if they're ambitious. Only then, would I want Universal to bring about a DisneySea-level 3rd gate
Wait, so you have a source who is engaged in confidential WDC meetings, yet spills the topics of those confidential meetings to.. YOU? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA sorry that's the dumbest thing I have ever heard.. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAExactly. Disney will eventually agree with universal that they can use Marvel because they own Marvel anyways. Universal will be allowed to keep its current island and can expand but only at said IOA and not any where else. My sources are Shareholder meetings and confidential Walt Disney Co. Meetings on the subject. Disney and Universal wont be making any plans anytime soon but don't forget how Disney now owns Marvel. It be like if Warner Brothers added a new ThemePark, they could build there own Wizarding World of Harry Potter because the Brothers Warner Own the Film and to an extant most of the World Wide Publishing rights to JK Rowlings Harry Potter. But no ones stupid enough to do anything with that it has to many complications legally for anyone to ever hurt a competitor even if they own theCompany to which the theme park land is themed
Exactly. Disney will eventually agree with universal that they can use Marvel because they own Marvel anyways. Universal will be allowed to keep its current island and can expand but only at said IOA and not any where else. My sources are Shareholder meetings and confidential Walt Disney Co. Meetings on the subject. Disney and Universal wont be making any plans anytime soon but don't forget how Disney now owns Marvel. It be like if Warner Brothers added a new ThemePark, they could build there own Wizarding World of Harry Potter because the Brothers Warner Own the Film and to an extant most of the World Wide Publishing rights to JK Rowlings Harry Potter. But no ones stupid enough to do anything with that it has to many complications legally for anyone to ever hurt a competitor even if they own theCompany to which the theme park land is themed
Which you would think an individual with such "sources" would know....Disney doesn't have to "agree", Universal has the rights for as long as they want to keep them. Disney doesn't not have to "allow" them to keep IOA.
I admittedly don't read comics much at all, but I read those two because of the amazing reputation they have garnered over the years. They're brilliant.Or Maus. 1986 was a GREAT year for comics. Watchmen always makes me think about 1986 since it was one of those great comics that year. Sorry to go off topic a bit.....
The actual logistics of having a Krustyland away from Springfield and The Simpsons Ride aside, Krustyland isn't even a big deal in Simpsons lore. It certainly is well behind landmarks like Itchy and Scratchy Land, Kamp Krusty, and the Frying Dutchman.Would they really demolish Doctor Doom. Couldn't they just move it to Krustyland and re-theme it to the Death Drop ride in the cartoon version of Krustyland?
Those films were produced and financed by Marvel Studios as an independent entity. Paramount signed a deal to distribute those films worldwide. They have no ownership of the films themselves.Paramount developed Iron Man and Universal did The Incredible Hulk. Those films came out before Disney even bought Marvel.
You've copied and pasted this lost a number of times here. This is a wishlist and calls for a new rebuilding of each gate.To be fair, both parks have a lot to fix before they're "complete".
IOA:
the Doom/Carnage/arcade area
fixing up Hulk
sprucing up Storm Force
raising MSHI's overall aesthetic to Potter levels
the Toon Lagoon front area (Comic Strip Lane, Dudley, the Theater, the carnival games)
Toon Lagoon's purpose (possibly a revamp/retheme)
Discovery Center's datedness
the remainder of the Trikes plot
JPRA in general
FJ's showbuilding intrusion upon JP
DC in general
LC's purpose
Seuss Trolley's 40" height requirement
Green Eggs and Ham
the plot next to Cat
Cat's datedness and 36" height requirement
no real non-stunt related shows
lack of all-ages attractions
lack of nighttime entertainment
lack of smaller, more intimate experiences (A and B tickets)
lack of indoor attractions (only 4 in the entire park)
USF:
lack of cohesiveness in Production Central/entrance area
Shrek's datedness
HRRR's lack of theming/intrusion upon USF's skyline
Twister's datedness
Major upgrades for ROTM
Disaster's datedness/unreliability
Fear Factor's existence
Major upgrades/revamp for MIB: AA
expansion into the mystery plot
KidZone revamp
Major upgrades for E.T.
E.T.'s 34" height requirement
T2's datedness
Lack of a water-based attraction
Lack of non-screen based attractions
Lack of all-ages attractions
Before all of this gets resolved, it should take 7-10 years to get all of it accomplished. Most of it is minor, so possibly 6-8 years if they're ambitious. Only then, would I want Universal to bring about a DisneySea-level 3rd gate
You clearly do not have the slightest clue as to what you are talking about. Contracts are legally binding. Ownership doesn't magically change them.Exactly. Disney will eventually agree with universal that they can use Marvel because they own Marvel anyways. Universal will be allowed to keep its current island and can expand but only at said IOA and not any where else. My sources are Shareholder meetings and confidential Walt Disney Co. Meetings on the subject. Disney and Universal wont be making any plans anytime soon but don't forget how Disney now owns Marvel. It be like if Warner Brothers added a new ThemePark, they could build there own Wizarding World of Harry Potter because the Brothers Warner Own the Film and to an extant most of the World Wide Publishing rights to JK Rowlings Harry Potter. But no ones stupid enough to do anything with that it has to many complications legally for anyone to ever hurt a competitor even if they own theCompany to which the theme park land is themed
Except Dazney cuz there's magic & stuffYou clearly do not have the slightest clue as to what you are talking about. Contracts are legally binding. Ownership doesn't magically change them.
But wishful thinking apparently does.Contracts are legally binding. Ownership doesn't magically change them.
rioriz. Tsk, tsk, your monkey is not drinkin' an I.C.Light.
But he/she has inside sources of confidential Disney management meetings. Which can only mean his/her source is a Disney manager, or their admins. Since Disney reads these boards, I expect an admin will be fired pretty soon for leaking to some random member on a Disney fan site, the contents of confidential meetings, not meant to be public knowledge.You clearly do not have the slightest clue as to what you are talking about. Contracts are legally binding. Ownership doesn't magically change them.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.