• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
BRING BACK HAND-DRAWN ANIMATION!

Seriously, it’s so much more charming than computer animation (which I know wasn’t the point of your post, but I hope you’ll forgive me).
I agree, I’d love more hand drawn animation.

One other thing I’d add is how “non real” CG typically works well, something intentionally cartoony like Cars works, had they made them photo realistic cars with eyes and mouths I think it would have come off as freaky though, I’m also optimistic something like Stitch will work because we don’t associate Aliens as real so our brains tend to believe them as CG.

When they try to make something real look real though they better nail it or our brains will instantly think it looks off.
 

Farerb

Well-Known Member
Fair enough. Personally I don’t feel strongly one way or the other. There’s bad 2d animation and there’s bad 3d animation. Both excell in their own ways.
I haven't enjoyed any of Disney's CGI films except Tangled and Moana and I only like 6 Pixar movies.
 

WorldExplorer

Well-Known Member
"Walt's vision" for these characters was for them to be designed as cartoons. They cannot simply be directly adapted into "live action." Things that are expressive, or endearing, or comical in a cartoon are weird and off putting in a realistic setting. Taking cartoon characters like the dwarves, with cartoon anatomy and proportions.... and then sticking on realistic human skin, hair, and clothes is ugly and disturbing. No clue how the people making these films greenlight this stuff with their eyes open.

Realistic dwarfs is just as stupid as trying to make a realistic CGI llama for an Emperor's New Groove remake.

(Not to imply that any kind of ENG remake would be smart...or any kind of Snow White remake, for that matter...)

Realitically speaking, actual people for the dwarfs is also not a good option, because they're not going to capture the charm of them either; that charm was inherently tied to their cartoonish-ness. It's just the least dumb option that makes the most sense with the "live action remake" premise; the result would be "okay-ish" rather than "WHAT THE HELL IS THAT!?".

The best idea was just to not make it, but Disney really wanted that money.

Current prediction is a 68% drop for Snow White in its second weekend (worse than Dumbo), with $13.7 million total



Glad that worked out for them.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
That’s good? But I don’t think TWDC is interested in sorta breaking even while tying up 300m over 3-5 years.

You’ll note nowhere I implied it was good. Hence why we struggle having nuanced conversations here sometimes.

My qualifier was and has always been in this range “disappointing”.

Not a defense, but movies have their own subsidiaries during production for a reason. Capital isn’t tied up in these projects until release.
 

Minnesota disney fan

Well-Known Member
I’m a child of the twentieth century. I will never enjoy computer animation as much as the hand-drawn variety.
I've gone to Disneyworld when they had the imagineers in HS actually working on the next movie. We got to see them at work on "The Lion King" before it was released. I thought it was amazing how wonderful that looked, and also the fact that we got to see them at work. I think Disney is really missing that hand drawn effect on their new movies. Anyone can push a button to make the new effects, but nothing replaces hand drawn, IMO!
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
I've gone to Disneyworld when they had the imagineers in HS actually working on the next movie. We got to see them at work on "The Lion King" before it was released. I thought it was amazing how wonderful that looked, and also the fact that we got to see them at work. I think Disney is really missing that hand drawn effect on their new movies. Anyone can push a button to make the new effects, but nothing replaces hand drawn, IMO!
I don't agree with the bolded—good computer animation takes a lot of skill—but I share your overall sentiments!
 

Indy_UK

Well-Known Member
Current prediction is a 68% drop for Snow White in its second weekend (worse than Dumbo), with $13.7 million total


And you know what. Disney STILL won't learn from this.
 

Minnesota disney fan

Well-Known Member
I would love that but are younger viewers also want it to come back? I Feel its older people like me who grew up with them the only ones asking for them.
I agree. This newer generation was raised on technology. There's nothing wrong with that.
I just realized that my generation is the last one to be raised without technology. Wow!
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
3D artists are still artists. There’s a lot of similar hard work that goes into these films. Just because the end medium is different (a screen versus paper), doesn’t mean the artistry has disappeared.

Now that said, this is an artistic styling that hasn’t really overtaken the Asian markets and as we swing back to another downswing of the Americas pop culture influence, I could see there becoming more and more Asian market influence that eventually impacts American artistry in some ways.

Written another way, anime is increasingly penetrating North America that probably our more Gen X skewing membership here wouldn’t really be in tune with. A lot of you wouldn’t have even been young enough to have experienced the first wave in your childhood.

The hybridized looks are even making a comeback with the Saturday morning cartoon vibes of things like Xmen 97 for the North American markets.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom