• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Lets break it down.

"I just dislike when people frame it as half the country being insulted"

Meaning I framed it as half the people not actual voters. So that's the information that's being referenced.

"when its really less than a quarter."

Now your first part was infact referencing all people. And the 2nd part is part of the same sentence and thought. So if it's not half of the people, it's less than a quarter. That leaves 75%+ the other direction.

So yes I reread what you said. And it's exactly what it says. Now did you actually screw up the wording, or was it intentionally written that way to discredit my post? That's the question.
Here’s what you said:
That's fairly ignorant to say. Why do I have to get over it? The ones who need to get over anything, are the ones that think she didn't alienate a huge part of the buying public and are making excuses for her. That's money this film desperately needed. And constantly trying to spin it. Quick question, wasn't the vote pretty close to 50/50?
You are very clearly implying that Zegler insulted half the American audience with her comments since the vote was 50/ 50. In fact, as Irish points out, half of the people who voted is not half of the potential audience for the film, which is the entire population of the country. Assuming every single voter for a particular candidate took umbrage at Zegler’s comments, that’s 25% or so of the US population.

You also continually claim to be indifferent to the film but you have posted extensively on the topic. In fact, as I pointed out, you were one of the very first to post after Zegler’s announcement.
 
Last edited:

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
Your post appeared to be framing both reactions—to Smith (by you) and to Zegler (by others)—as indifference:

It's indifference. Example, I thought what will Smiths slap was disgusting. I won't ever see a Smith movie in a theater again. It's simple, it doesn't mesh with my values so I just ignore what he does. And to think that's not happened with Zegler, is a bit naive in my opinion. It's easy to not support people you don't like. And you don't even need to be outraged.​

You may feel indifferent towards Zegler, but those choosing not to see the film because of her by definition cannot be, just as you, as you acknowledge, are not indifferent towards Smith.
I get what you're saying but the post I was was referencing was accusing me of outrage. And that's not true. So it's an assumption that I was saying everyone was indifferent. The whole point was, yes people have a problem with it, they're not indifferent, and that's what I'm talking about and defending. And my slap example was a comparison of a situation that's similar that does upset me enough to not support an actor. Just like what she said, like it or not, did have that same effect on many. And to deny it seems pretty silly. As I've said, it's not the only thing that doomed this film.
 

Agent H

Well-Known Member
I think society in general has become more nasty as we’ve become more isolated via technology, it’s ironic that we have more ways to communicate than ever before but that’s lead to more isolation and made it infinitely easier to be nasty since communication is rarely face to face anymore.

Online gaming is a great example of this, when I was a kid we played games side by side on the couch, we’d talk smack but you always knew if you pushed it too far there was a good chance you were getting punched, several years ago I played an online FPS game with my nephew and was absolutely shocked by what I heard, I’ve never heard people talk trash like that before, it was absolutely horrific and the level of abuse was relentless. My nephew said that’s normal and just part of the fun, I honestly don’t know how anyone could find that level of verbal abuse fun but to him it was just normal and just part of the game.
Yeah maybe I’m overreacting but I’m noticing a disturbing trend among my peers of thinking violence is funny.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member

Chi84

Premium Member
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Lets break it down.

"I just dislike when people frame it as half the country being insulted"

Meaning I framed it as half the people not actual voters. So that's the information that's being referenced.

"when its really less than a quarter."

Now your first part was infact referencing all people. And the 2nd part is part of the same sentence and thought. So if it's not half of the people, it's less than a quarter. That leaves 75%+ the other direction.

So yes I reread what you said. And it's exactly what it says. Now did you actually screw up the wording, or was it intentionally written that way to discredit my post? That's the question.
Wait what?!

I can’t tell but did you subtract the indifferent people who decided not to see the film a year before its release?
 

Farerb

Well-Known Member
Current prediction is a 68% drop for Snow White in its second weekend (worse than Dumbo), with $13.7 million total

They should just release it at Disney+ at this point.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
You are very clearly implying that Zegler insulted half the American audience with her comments since the vote was 50/ 50. In fact, as Irish points out, half of the people who voted is not half of the potential audience for the film, which is the entire population of the country.
You could at least quote the right thing. I mean come on. You quoted me asking, wasn't the VOTE 50/50. The vote was just about 50/50. I'll do it for you.
But I would like for you to post the quote of Pratt insulting half the country.
Here's where you fail, and not just you but your club too. You and your posse are quick to say, oh wait made up facts!!!! And then counter with, look at that, made up facts. Yes I said half, and I've said before it's potentially. That said, please point to the statistic that breaks down exactly what every person thought of what she said. Saying that potentially upsetting half the people is no less accurate than whatever nonsense you are pushing.
You also continually claim to be indifferent to the film but you have posted extensively on the topic. In fact, as I pointed out, you were one of the very first to post after Zegler’s announcement.
So I can't have an opinion? Oh I forgot, it doesn't align with yours, agenda!!! I have been clearly against the remakes from the start. And why have I posted so extensively on it? Because of people like you. The constant accusations and harassment. Hell, you did it in this post. At this Point I think you're just blind to it.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
"Walt's vision" for these characters was for them to be designed as cartoons. They cannot simply be directly adapted into "live action." Things that are expressive, or endearing, or comical in a cartoon are weird and off putting in a realistic setting.

I think this has been the downfall of most of the live action movie's, even the ones that have made a ton of money, they simply look “wrong”. There’s something charming and endearing about cartoons, that’s lost when they try to make something “real”.

We all know what a lion looks like and how a lion acts, when they try to combine reality with talking and non natural actions it feels wrong.

I enjoyed Mufasa but the entire time I felt like I was watching a presentation of CG technology, what they can do now is very impressive but it’s also a bit off putting because it still doesn’t “look” quite right.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
I think this has been the downfall of most of the live action movie's, even the ones that have made a ton of money, they simply look “wrong”. There’s something charming and endearing about cartoons, that’s lost when they try to make something “real”.

We all know what a lion looks like and how a lion acts, when they try to combine reality with talking and non natural actions it feels wrong.

I enjoyed Mufasa but the entire time I felt like I was watching a presentation of CG technology, what they can do now is very impressive but it’s also a bit off putting because it still doesn’t “look” quite right.
BRING BACK HAND-DRAWN ANIMATION!

Seriously, it’s so much more charming than computer animation (which I know wasn’t the point of your post, but I hope you’ll forgive me).
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
BRING BACK HAND-DRAWN ANIMATION!

Seriously, it’s so much more charming than computer animation (which I know wasn’t the point of your post, but I hope you’ll forgive me).
I agree, I’d love more hand drawn animation.

One other thing I’d add is how “non real” CG typically works well, something intentionally cartoony like Cars works, had they made them photo realistic cars with eyes and mouths I think it would have come off as freaky though, I’m also optimistic something like Stitch will work because we don’t associate Aliens as real so our brains tend to believe them as CG.

When they try to make something real look real though they better nail it or our brains will instantly think it looks off.
 

Farerb

Well-Known Member
Fair enough. Personally I don’t feel strongly one way or the other. There’s bad 2d animation and there’s bad 3d animation. Both excell in their own ways.
I haven't enjoyed any of Disney's CGI films except Tangled and Moana and I only like 6 Pixar movies.
 

WorldExplorer

Well-Known Member
"Walt's vision" for these characters was for them to be designed as cartoons. They cannot simply be directly adapted into "live action." Things that are expressive, or endearing, or comical in a cartoon are weird and off putting in a realistic setting. Taking cartoon characters like the dwarves, with cartoon anatomy and proportions.... and then sticking on realistic human skin, hair, and clothes is ugly and disturbing. No clue how the people making these films greenlight this stuff with their eyes open.

Realistic dwarfs is just as stupid as trying to make a realistic CGI llama for an Emperor's New Groove remake.

(Not to imply that any kind of ENG remake would be smart...or any kind of Snow White remake, for that matter...)

Realitically speaking, actual people for the dwarfs is also not a good option, because they're not going to capture the charm of them either; that charm was inherently tied to their cartoonish-ness. It's just the least dumb option that makes the most sense with the "live action remake" premise; the result would be "okay-ish" rather than "WHAT THE HELL IS THAT!?".

The best idea was just to not make it, but Disney really wanted that money.

Current prediction is a 68% drop for Snow White in its second weekend (worse than Dumbo), with $13.7 million total



Glad that worked out for them.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom