Yeah, but what about Wish?
A film that would have turned a profit in 2019.
Yeah, but what about Wish?
I agree with most of this… and it was part of my thinking with my post…. I was surprised it was projected at 40 million….which for all intents and purposes it is basically an original film… I mean Apes was only projected at 10 million more and that is a long standing franchiseI think the problem is the expectation of a first movie like this. It's not like the fall guy was some uber popular show. Sure it had it's moments in the 80s but it's not one of those culturally iconic shows. The film has a modest budget and the marketing doesn't seem out of whack. So 375mil would be the aprox break even point. That's very doable especially with good word of mouth. It's done 67mil as of the last reported numbers. Now I haven't seen it yet, so I'm not sure if it has franchise aspersions. But if it can break even, and the reviews are strong, you're in good shape and your sequels should do bigger numbers now that people know about the franchise. Something like toy story did 300mil or so. Then part 2 about 500mil and then 3 onebillion. That's the playbook that they should be looking at. But it's all predicated on a responsible budget. If toy story was 150mil to make, uh oh. But it was 30mil so it was fine.
Had The Fall Guy been a Disney-affiliated film, I’m sure no-one here would be talking (sensibly) about inflation and other humdrum factors.Yeah, but what about Wish?
Well the writer of Barbie is a writer of Snow WhiteFinally saw Barbie tonight and loved how clever and funny it was, Disney hasn’t put out anything that good in several years.
Just goes to show you can include an underlying social message and still be funny and successful as long as the story is good.
Thank you for at least acknowledging that it has a social message. Several Barbie fans in this forum have repeatedly denied that glaringly obvious fact because it doesn’t accord with claims they make about Disney.Finally saw Barbie tonight and loved how clever and funny it was, Disney hasn’t put out anything that good in several years.
Just goes to show you can include an underlying social message and still be funny and successful as long as the story is good.
It ran for 5 seasons over 6 years. I’m sure some people remember it, but it doesn’t even matter because aside from the title, the lead character’s name and that it’s about a stunt man, it has virtually nothing at all to do with the tv series.
Finally saw Barbie tonight and loved how clever and funny it was, Disney hasn’t put out anything that good in several years.
Just goes to show you can include an underlying social message and still be funny and successful as long as the story is good.
Thank you for at least acknowledging that it has a social message. Several Barbie fans in this forum have repeatedly denied that glaringly obvious fact because it doesn’t accord with claims they make about Disney.
The film has a modest budget and the marketing doesn't seem out of whack. So 375mil would be the aprox break even point. That's very doable especially with good word of mouth. It's done 67mil as of the last reported numbers.
Well, the way this year is going that all but guarantees it will lose money. Had it come in at 20% or under they would have had a real blockbuster on their hands.First round of reviews are in for Planet of the Apes on Rotten Tomatoes: 85% positive.
That’s a very strong multiple it requires though. 3.5x is more in line with CinemaScore, its budget, etc.
It can do it, 5.5X is possible, but that’s a big task. If it does they’ll for sure green light a sequel. That would be excellent legs!
If a movie has really strong word of mouth there are cases where a modest hit can justify a sequel based on popularity.
The first Austin Powers grossed $50 million but people loved it and no doubt had strong home video uptake. The sequel quadrupled the gross of the original.
It did have the benefit of being low cost though, and the first one was profitable.
I suspect studios will be less risk averse in today's climate but if Fall Guy ekes out a small profit AND is sufficiently liked there's still a chance it's a viable franchise.
Clickbate article, that is not exactly what he said. He isn't involve in the creative aspects of Marvel. Rather that he is discussing with Feige and the Marvel Team about slowing down output, refocus on quality rather than quantity. Which isn't new, he said the same thing last year.Ohhh this will fix it…
Disney's Iger to have hand in Marvel's makeover
Disney CEO Bob Iger indicated Tuesday he has been involved in honing Marvel and other Disney studio output.www.foxbusiness.com
Yeah…feel like we’ve heard this beforeClickbate article, that is not exactly what he said. He isn't involve in the creative aspects of Marvel. Rather that he is discussing with Feige and the Marvel Team about slowing down output, refocus on quality rather than quantity. Which isn't new, he said the same thing last year.
They haven’t had a release since Iger last discussed this, Deadpool will be the first release.Yeah…feel like we’ve heard this before
How’d it work the last time?
Not marvel, Sunny JimThey haven’t had a release since Iger last discussed this, Deadpool will be the first release.
The article was about Marvel, so that is what I'm discussing not anything else. If you want to discuss something else please be clear about it and not this vague crap Grandpa.Not marvel, Sunny Jim
The last time he did this “calming influence” crap it still has that studio in shambles…
And nobody is buying - checks ticker - his schtick anymore.
This guy is so past his prime. He’ll be the last to know
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.