News Country Bear Jamboree is getting new songs and acts

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
Wow. I Wasn’t sure if that was all real. But crazy thought. It all worked out in the end. Moana is getting the attraction it deserves, the country bears got a redo with love put into it, and Toy Story didn’t expand. Man, with that bad blood, chapek really was stupid.
You can say that again! The current Bob isn't too great either, but at least he's not as bad...
 

Streetway

Well-Known Member
Probably the only post-Walt attraction to have this status, which is incredible when you think about it!
bears deserve it so much, but i do think one other things officially has that status too: the character of figment existing in imagination. Legitimately, with all the merchandise and hype around him, and how ingrained his character has become in the park’s lore, I feel like Figment is on that eschelon where he has become a part of that parks identity.
 

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
bears deserve it so much, but i do think one other things officially has that status too: the character of figment existing in imagination. Legitimately, with all the merchandise and hype around him, and how ingrained his character has become in the park’s lore, I feel like Figment is on that eschelon where he has become a part of that parks identity.
True! Fingers crossed that at D23 we'll finally hear the words we've all been waiting for- "We're redoing Journey into Imagination and bringing back the Dreamfinder!"
 

mightynine

Well-Known Member
I would also gently note this seems to be a specifically Disney issue: no-one gives Universal a hard time about being all-IP, all the time.

My personal opinion on that is Uni has always been about IP so there’s a different expectation there, whereas the Disney parks (initially) had the familiarity of IP as a draw for the other experiences in the parks.
 

Sir_Cliff

Well-Known Member
My personal opinion on that is Uni has always been about IP so there’s a different expectation there, whereas the Disney parks (initially) had the familiarity of IP as a draw for the other experiences in the parks.
The reason I mentioned that is that there was a reference to theme park purists rather than specifically Disney theme park purists, and I do see very different expectations for Disney versus their rivals. It seems people will complain about the IP invasion of Disney at the same time as suggesting an all-IP park like Epic Universe is showing Disney how it should be done.
 
Last edited:

celluloid

Well-Known Member
The reason I mentioned that is that there was a reference to theme park purists rather than specifically Disney theme park purists, and I do see very different expectations for Disney versus their rivals. It seems people will complain about the IP invasion of Disney at the same time as suggestion an all-IP park like Epic Universe is showing Disney how it should be done.

Not true. Dark Universe of course timeless monster inspired, but not in the art direction of the classics. It is park specific.

Almost how Pirates of the Cairbbean/Jungle Cruise/Haunted Mansion was not really Treasure Island/African Queen/House on Haunted HIll but certainly inspired by.

Celestial Gardens also throws that entirely out the window. It may not be as rich but it is its own environment.

Also event wise HHN has more than half of its experience not tied into outside Intellectual Property. Some of the In-house typically end up being the most popular or near it as time goes on.

Other special events have had in house environments made for them.

Volcano Bay is a waterpark, but it is a completely original backstory. I don't think Disney would do Blizard Beach or Typhoon Lagoon the same way again, nor have they since.

Universal was the last major FL theme park to build original theme park lands in 1999, IOA had two original lands (and 2017 if you count Volcano Bay) and will be the next to do it with Epic Universe. Disney has actually taken some of their original lands and are changing them to IP layovers or have already.
 
Last edited:

easyrowrdw

Well-Known Member
Something current execs at Disney don't seem to realize- Pirates of the Caribbean and Haunted Mansion didn't become popular (and more importantly to them, profitable) because they were based off a movie people knew. They were unique experiences only found in the parks (before the movie adaptations) and their fandoms grew from that. They're iconic BECAUSE they're original, not in spite of it. Disney is too afraid to take changes and waste precious money on something that could gasp potentially not sell a million princess dresses.
I remember returning from my first Disney visit as a kid and my favorite thing was Figment. I knew nothing of it beforehand and never saw it outside the parks. But it was by far my favorite Disney thing and I told everyone about it.
 

Disgruntled Walt

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
I 100% expect this iteration to make its way to Japan. This seems like something that audience would eat right up.
But it's already popular as it is. There is no reason for it. This isn't going to change the popularity of the CBs at WDW long-term. There will be a mild bump at the start of its lifespan, but it's going to settle into the same level of crowds as the previous version had.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom