eddie104
Well-Known Member
I'm pretty sure the trial hasn't happened yet and its possible he might get 7 years.He is getting 7 years I read today, hope it was worth it
I'm pretty sure the trial hasn't happened yet and its possible he might get 7 years.He is getting 7 years I read today, hope it was worth it
Disney and Taylor have not filed charges --sets a bad precedent that violence against Disney employees is tolerated over potential negative PR.
It is 100% up to the CM.It's not really up to the CM and it's certainly not up to Disney. Though in misdemeanor scuffles such as this, if the victim states that they don't wish for charges to be filed, then the state or district attorney is unlikely to file charges.
This is far from the first time something like this has happened at Disney.
It is 100% up to the CM.
You do realize, don't you, that FPs aren't paper any more...?
He is getting 7 years I read today, hope it was worth it
Yes eventually it’s up to the prosecutor, but in practice this is not how the process starts. The police will ask the victim if they would like to press charges. If yes they'll investigate and start the process to get things going in the court, if not they don’t really do anything and move on. You’re really looking at this with a bit of a stretch of technicalities.Common misconception, but not true. The victim does not press or file charges.. only a prosecutor. Additionally, a victim may say that they do not wish for charges to be filed, but a prosecuting attorney can decide to do so anyways without the victims cooperation. The reverse also happens more often when a victim wants charges to be filed but the prosecution feels there's insufficient evidence for criminal charges.
The misconception comes from when a victim says that they would like for charges to be filed and will cooperate with the prosecution in order to do so... in this sense, they are said to "press charges", but they don't really have final say.
Yes eventually it’s up to the prosecutor, but in practice this is not how the process starts. The police will ask the victim if they would like to press charges. If yes they'll investigate and start the process to get things going in the court, if not they don’t really do anything and move on. You’re really looking at this with a bit of a stretch of technicalities.
Some are. I received this last year when Space Mountain went down while waiting in line.You do realize, don't you, that FPs aren't paper any more...?
To be fair I do like exploring technicalities, so I appreciate the perspective you’re offering. Just in practical practice when the police are initially on the scene they very much leave it up to the victim if they want charges to be persued. Much of what you’re discussing would come a few steps down the road, and possibly could in this situation although probably unlikely.The post I replied to said they were disappointed that the CM nor Disney "filed charges". Just pointing out that it's not up to either of them to file charges and that the prosecutor can file charges without the consent of the victim if they think the crime warrants it. Yes it's technical (though not a "stretch"), and "press charges" is a loosely-defined not-very-technical term... but it bothered me enough to post. Probably didn't add much of anything to the discussion, though. My apologies.
Are you OK?I blame the media. If the CM pressed charges, the aggressor would claim to be the victim, and since it's Disney, the story would run. It would tell the story of the evil empire denying admittance to an attraction to a poor family who saved and traveled for their dream vacation. How poorly they were treated, how this ruined their vacation. their continued stress, and how much they love Disney, and now cannot return. The assault would be downplayed, if mentioned at all. This is the result of avoidance of negative publicity by the media and lobby groups.
With all due respect, (and I seriously mean that as you have always come.off as objective and open to discussion), my post said nothing in regards to glamorizing this type of behavior (but I agree that society does) nor did it mention that the person should not face a penalty. She absolutely should.I understand what you are saying, but do not agree. It is the sentiment that "oh, we shouldn't judge others" is what gives people license to act this way. If society didn't glamorize and, in a way, allow this type of behavior, but condemned it more harshly, then people would be less likely to commit these kinds of acts. There is zero justification for this person's actions.
Everyone involved should get prison time, including the women.
If by some stroke of magic it does happen, they won't do any real time... Some politician in California will spin it into a race issue (because holding certain demographics accountable for their disfunction is "white supremacy" now)
With all due respect, (and I seriously mean that as you have always come.off as objective and open to discussion), my post said nothing in regards to glamorizing this type of behavior (but I agree that society does) nor did it mention that the person should not face a penalty. She absolutely should.
I only intended to highlight that the people exclaiming , "prison time, "locker her up", etc", are not exemplifying any form of civilized behavior beyond the assailants own knee jerk reaction to punch a CM. The woman should absolutely be held responsible for her actions. I am not saying the woman shouldn't be locked up. I'm just saying that people on a message board demanding punishment be issued swiftly and harshly are doing exactly what the woman did. Acting on emotion. We should strive to be better than that. And that does not mean forgiveness and let her walk.
Some (many) people struggle to deal with control (which is an illusion) and allow emotion to dictate their actions. But I digress. I sincerely appreciate your mature response which allows discussion to remain civil and doesn't incite the villagers to grab the pitchforks
It's a felony - assault. To be prosecuted as a crime by the state attorney.
The State of Florida can stretch its legal arms to Illinois, I can assure you. I prepared extradition warrants for the state - both domestic and international.
There's no "protected class" for felonious assault. But I'm sure plenty of eyewitnesses to the assault. And video evidence.
This may be one of the most accurate comments I’ve read all day. Glad to see someone perceives things the same way I do, especially when living in today’s climate where there’s a new “controversy” every 15 minutes. It’s all a game the media is playing on us. It’s always been this way. But now, they have the internet to get their word across.I blame the media. If the CM pressed charges, the aggressor would claim to be the victim, and since it's Disney, the story would run. It would tell the story of the evil empire denying admittance to an attraction to a poor family who saved and traveled for their dream vacation. How poorly they were treated, how this ruined their vacation. their continued stress, and how much they love Disney, and now cannot return. The assault would be downplayed, if mentioned at all. This is the result of avoidance of negative publicity by the media and lobby groups.
Are you OK?
*Denying* me sugar causes uninhibited aggression!Sugar causes uninhibited aggression?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.