lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
His whole shtick is just making up ridiculous claims and then repeating them over and over again.It's an artists rendering.
How, or why, do you think this is AI? It's not the usual super smooth AI art.
His whole shtick is just making up ridiculous claims and then repeating them over and over again.It's an artists rendering.
How, or why, do you think this is AI? It's not the usual super smooth AI art.
It's by Disney design --raise the temperature and the guest buys more 5 dollar water and 5.50 sodaTheme parks historically were parklike, and the park-aspects of them are much of what makes them attractive places to spend time.
Removing heat dissipating and shade providing natural areas and replacing with concrete and rock work will both elevate the temperature and remove places for people to take breaks from the sun.
That’s not the key at all. It’s the relationship between things, including the existing ones that are being “protected” because the view would be so obviously jarring.I agree - looking forward to see how they solve that. I don't think it's difficult. The key is the size and scope of that center mountain pass.
Filling in water is cheap?
Also, they still need water and storm management if they remove the RoA, probably adds a ton more cost to the process.
Value engineering the value-store version of RSR is sure to be a winner.Sadly this will probably happen... they will decide it is too expensive after they have already completed demo on ROA and Tom Sawyer's Island, and then readjust plans and build a value engineered version of the ride shown...a scaled down and less impressive version of what it was supposed to be... you know like the new Flex Space Communicore Hall/Community College Cafetorium... I don't feel confident that these plans will come through with current leadership after the EPCOT debacle.
Trust in a brand is hard to gain and easy to lose. Repeatedly alienating your most loyal customers can't be good for the bottom-line.
Just to be clear, I was just making a joke about your use of "boatload" (since they're ditching the steamboat) lol. I know they have the room and it's really surprising to hear this isn't even the cheapest option. Would definitely prefer to keep the river!An insider on this thread already indicated that this wasn't even the cheapest option, but was chosen specifically to get rid of RoA/TSI. Other options were available and not pursued.
This requires diverting more water.Diverting water is expensive.
I agree… having cars at the back would have been better. But maybe they can build up a new river front area just north of the upcoming cars section? make it very natural, a la national parks… and if they do keep the back look, even shortened, imagine a villains land along the river. could be cool.This would be nice, but with the rivers tucked so far back, what's even the point? The best part of it is the views from LS/Frontierland. Now there's some race cars blocking the way. I wish they had put Cars on that back half of RoA/TSI and left the main part. It would all fit, I'm pretty sure. You can even keep that shape for Villains and not go out beyond the berm.
Why Can't they just put it here instead? Yes, they'd have to re-route Floridian Way, but they could just demo it and use Floridian Place onto Center Drive to access the Reedy Creek Energy Services Complex and move the equipment storage containers over to the west side of Floridian Place behind Reedy Creek Fire Sta. #3. Then they can re-route the Waterway parallel to the East Side of Floridian Place and over to reconnect south of the Dock for the 2nd Riverboat behind the Parade Staging Facilities to the rear of Pirates? That opens up much more than the same size parcel without destroying TSI and RoA which could both be refurbished, and kept for Posterity?
That’s not the key at all. It’s the relationship between things, including the existing ones that are being “protected” because the view would be so obviously jarring.
What do you mean filling in water?
Just because it’s 50 years old doesn’t mean that it has a history that dictates being preserved the way Disneyland’s is.MK is over 50 years old, it deserves nostalgia as well.
They only wanted to prevent boos and booing and revolt reaction from the crowd to be documented. This also begs to question with Monster's Inc Land not revealing the location of that either is it because of a revolt reaction if it were to replace Muppets Courtyard and not go to Animation Courtyard.(?)So no wonder they neglected to mention where the hell Cars Land is going during Mater’s hilarious Zoom call at the keynote. They were too cowardly to even show this map until the whole convention was over! If they know this decision is so unpopular they have to push it back and push it back to avoid potential backlash, why do it at all??
It would cost more money than where they have decided to put it.
Its all a meta-attraction on the effects of climate change. As in the future we'll be fighting over fresh water IRL, so to in the Magic Kingdom.Maybe we'll get a Haunted Mansion tombstone for the RoA too:
"Here lies the Rivers, once wild and free,
Now just a pond, as you can see."
I had the same thought! The current concept doesn’t rule this out… I’m hopeful that they plan to save the northern loop of ROA. It would allow big thunder to remain on the water front and they could dock the belle just west of the haunted mansion in a new small extension of liberty square which would transition to villains…
View attachment 808700
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.