News Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

andre85

Well-Known Member
An insider on this thread already indicated that this wasn't even the cheapest option, but was chosen specifically to get rid of RoA/TSI. Other options were available and not pursued.
Just to be clear, I was just making a joke about your use of "boatload" (since they're ditching the steamboat) lol. I know they have the room and it's really surprising to hear this isn't even the cheapest option. Would definitely prefer to keep the river!
Edit: Didn't realize you were the person I had first responded to haha.
 

Conor.Nam15

Member
This would be nice, but with the rivers tucked so far back, what's even the point? The best part of it is the views from LS/Frontierland. Now there's some race cars blocking the way. I wish they had put Cars on that back half of RoA/TSI and left the main part. It would all fit, I'm pretty sure. You can even keep that shape for Villains and not go out beyond the berm.
I agree… having cars at the back would have been better. But maybe they can build up a new river front area just north of the upcoming cars section? make it very natural, a la national parks… and if they do keep the back look, even shortened, imagine a villains land along the river. could be cool.

it would also allow a section of the rail road to pass through that wooded area along the northwest bank of ROA
 

SirLink

Well-Known Member
Why Can't they just put it here instead? Yes, they'd have to re-route Floridian Way, but they could just demo it and use Floridian Place onto Center Drive to access the Reedy Creek Energy Services Complex and move the equipment storage containers over to the west side of Floridian Place behind Reedy Creek Fire Sta. #3. Then they can re-route the Waterway parallel to the East Side of Floridian Place and over to reconnect south of the Dock for the 2nd Riverboat behind the Parade Staging Facilities to the rear of Pirates? That opens up much more than the same size parcel without destroying TSI and RoA which could both be refurbished, and kept for Posterity?

It would cost more money than where they have decided to put it.
 

JD80

Well-Known Member
That’s not the key at all. It’s the relationship between things, including the existing ones that are being “protected” because the view would be so obviously jarring.

Can you speak in more detail? The key is to make sure the elements blend properly as you come from Fantasyland to a dark forest to snowy peaks into the desert area. You can do that with a narrow line of sight with trees and "mountains". but It's also got to feel purposeful and open.

Should be fun talking about in the coming years.
 

Mr. Sullivan

Well-Known Member
MK is over 50 years old, it deserves nostalgia as well.
Just because it’s 50 years old doesn’t mean that it has a history that dictates being preserved the way Disneyland’s is.

I am WDW goer through and through. I only visited DL for the first time in my life this year. I don’t say this as a DL local who hates WDW.

Disneyland is the park that not just started it all, it is the park that started modern theme parks as we know them. It is the park that all other massive theme parks owe their lives to. It is the park whose design has influenced every Disney park to follow and even ones that aren’t Disney parks. It is the place where the impossible became possible and entertainment changed forever.

Magic Kingdom is not that park.

Magic Kingdom is a little sibling that has struggled its whole life to live up to its older sibling. It was a park that was put into doubt and disarray when Walt died and the people he left behind were unprepared to take it where he maybe would have.

In the timeline where Walt lived, Magic Kingdom is maybe on par or even better than Disneyland. That timeline isn’t this one. It is an inferior park that has struggled for decades to completely escape the shadow of the park that it was modeled after. The best thing they can do for Magic Kingdom is attempt to give it an identity of it’s own rather than being the lesser form the original Disneyland.

Disnseyland deserves it’s preservation because it has earned it. It is living, breathing history. Would we be talking the same way about Magic Kingdom if it weren’t the most visited theme park in the world? Would would be talking about it the same way if say Tokyo Disneyland opened second instead of Magic Kingdom? I don’t think so.

Bigger does not always mean it is worthy of more than the smaller counterpart. Frozen is a much, much, much more successful movie than Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, but should we then say that Frozen is a more important thing to keep preserved and remembered than Snow White?
 

Magenta Panther

Well-Known Member
Well, I guess it was to be expected. The Robert Iger Company always lives up to the lowest expectations.

My god, I can't believe it. Rivers of America and the Riverboat are being destroyed to sell more Cars merchandise. However you might hate Iger, you can't hate him enough.

The Rivers of America is beautiful, and the Riverboat is a lovely experience. And, best of all, is non-IP. But that, in Iger's eyes, is its great, unforgivable sin.

I hope WDW gets its butt kicked by Universal. I hope it never catches up. This is despicable.
 

Raineman

Well-Known Member
I remember one poster replied to a message and said "No this won't be the last straw for anyone." Well, he's wrong. Whatever subsection of pixie-dusters that like this and want to passive-aggressively mock and insult the people who don't like it-please enjoy the space that I will not be occupying anymore. I'd like to thank Disney for giving me a place to enjoy with family over the years, but time to move on.
 

Chef idea Mickey`=

Well-Known Member
So no wonder they neglected to mention where the hell Cars Land is going during Mater’s hilarious Zoom call at the keynote. They were too cowardly to even show this map until the whole convention was over! If they know this decision is so unpopular they have to push it back and push it back to avoid potential backlash, why do it at all??
They only wanted to prevent boos and booing and revolt reaction from the crowd to be documented. This also begs to question with Monster's Inc Land not revealing the location of that either is it because of a revolt reaction if it were to replace Muppets Courtyard and not go to Animation Courtyard.(?)
 

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
I had the same thought! The current concept doesn’t rule this out… I’m hopeful that they plan to save the northern loop of ROA. It would allow big thunder to remain on the water front and they could dock the belle just west of the haunted mansion in a new small extension of liberty square which would transition to villains…

View attachment 808700
1723481636180.png

Tried to modify this layout to have Cars in the back half of the river while keeping that shape for Villains land. Totally possible, and they can even extend further behind Fantasyland if they really want. No train track modification required.
 

JD80

Well-Known Member
The water that is currently there but won't be anymore. What exactly do you think they are doing with it if they aren't filling that space with land?

I don't think it's all being filled in. I think the depth is going to be some of the lower parts of the track. Some of it has water in it still. Red is lower race track, blue looks like water.

People are lamenting the loss of water. But do people not see the giant waterfalls in all the concept art?

1723481706157.png
 

Conor.Nam15

Member
View attachment 808711
Tried to modify this layout to have Cars in the back half of the river while keeping that shape for Villains land. Totally possible, and they can even extend further behind Fantasyland if they really want. No train track modification required.
We’d all be celebrating this layout! (While still bemoaning cars in Frontierland 😅)

would’ve been great
 

Ghost93

Well-Known Member
So no wonder they neglected to mention where the hell Cars Land is going during Mater’s hilarious Zoom call at the keynote. They were too cowardly to even show this map until the whole convention was over! If they know this decision is so unpopular they have to push it back and push it back to avoid potential backlash, why do it at all??
They know it's unpopular with hardcore, hyper online parks fans, but know it will be very popular with the general public.

I don't like the Cars IP, but the concept art of the new Cars land has me a little bit relieved, as I find the evergreen trees aesthetically pleasing. They seem to be going for a mountain/woodsy vibe. It will likely blend in well with Tiana's Bayou Adventure.
 

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
Okay so it's true. Less Beyond Big Thunder and more... in-front and beside, with a little Villain's to the right corner.

Makes you wonder what will eventually end up directly behind Big Thunder, or if that isn't in the cards anymore?

So is this kids ride a little, outdoor... trackless car ride?

Small ride.png
 

John park hopper

Well-Known Member
Just because it’s 50 years old doesn’t mean that it has a history that dictates being preserved the way Disneyland’s is.

I am WDW goer through and through. I only visited DL for the first time in my life this year. I don’t say this as a DL local who hates WDW.

Disneyland is the park that not just started it all, it is the park that started modern theme parks as we know them. It is the park that all other massive theme parks owe their lives to. It is the park whose design has influenced every Disney park to follow and even ones that aren’t Disney parks. It is the place where the impossible became possible and entertainment changed forever.

Magic Kingdom is not that park.

Magic Kingdom is a little sibling that has struggled its whole life to live up to its older sibling. It was a park that was put into doubt and disarray when Walt died and the people he left behind were unprepared to take it where he maybe would have.

In the timeline where Walt lived, Magic Kingdom is maybe on par or even better than Disneyland. That timeline isn’t this one. It is an inferior park that has struggled for decades to completely escape the shadow of the park that it was modeled after. The best thing they can do for Magic Kingdom is attempt to give it an identity of it’s own rather than being the lesser form the original Disneyland.

Disnseyland deserves it’s preservation because it has earned it. It is living, breathing history. Would we be talking the same way about Magic Kingdom if it weren’t the most visited theme park in the world? Would would be talking about it the same way if say Tokyo Disneyland opened second instead of Magic Kingdom? I don’t think so.

Bigger does not always mean it is worthy of more than the smaller counterpart. Frozen is a much, much, much more successful movie than Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, but should we then say that Frozen is a more important thing to keep preserved and remembered than Snow White?
Sorry to disagree with you on all levels
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom