Exactly.
Yes, of course they won't tell the same story line beat for beat a 2nd time. But I guarantee no one at marvel or Disney said, we can't do that because of review bombers. Heck they basically retold a new hope with force awakens. So obviously Disney has no problem reusing story. So I'm with you that they wouldn't, but not the why they wouldn't.
Sony did with Amazing Spider-Man, its the exact reason why Feige didn't with Homecoming in the MCU because it would have been for a 3rd time.
Never claimed they did, I was just saying no reason to do it for that reason also not that Disney is making decisions because of it.
Shawshank bombed upon first release…
you move the goalposts…. Your original discernment was no one can name a movie that did not find an audience that was compelling.. which you present as an absolute truth….when People do…well yes but reasons
The goalposts have been on roller skates in the movie discussion threads for the last few years.
But this whole discussion was revolving around, review bombing was hurting the films. So in my opinion that's how I took it. So when he says compelling movies find an audience, that's the context I took it under. If strange world was compelling enough, the review bombing wouldn't matter.
Hence why I said of course they wouldn't do it. That's the reason. Review bombing isn't a blip on the radar as to why. And If they wanted to to reuse the story, I don't believe Disney would have a problem with doing it. But as you said, that wasn't going to happen.
Kinda sounded like you did. Then why even bring it up.
Wait, so you said, reused the same story line. That's exactly what they did with TFA. Sure it wasn't the same characters, but it's just as bad. So your review bomb statement wouldn't hold true if cap 4 was an identical mcu story they had already done, just with different characters?
Once again I never made the claim or even alluded to that Disney was making decisions based on review bombing. I was just saying that I don't think they would do something that would also add fuel to the fire in that regard, ie my opinion only.
In comics different characters fight other characters that others already fought before, its a normal comics trope, so I don't see that as reusing the same story line. But if in the movie Sam fights the exact same character in exact same way as in the show from just 2 years ago (as was the suggestion by the original poster), that is an identical reused story line. Heck I don't even see an issue with reusing a story line when its decades apart, just not when its so soon after its previous use. So if the MCU wants to retell the Sam fight US Agent (Hydra Cap) story again from FatWS in like a decade or two I'd be down to see it, but not 2 years after they already just did it.
No one said such as thing, so calm down.…wait…someone actually said that JJ Reboot didn’t do a Star Wars remake???
…like…out loud?
…just making sure no one said it (recently)
I have no issue with reboots, remakes, retellings, or even reused story lines in general. My point has been and will continue to be, I have an issue with it being done only 2 years after the previous attempt, and my guess is the public will too.
Are you talking the Spider-Man thing again?
Nope, you lost the conversation again.
Obviously people are talking about, we're talking about it, unless you don't count yourself or any of us people.
Not sure what any of this has to do with this conversation.
I've understood your opinion, understood it the 3000 other times you've said it, but you've continued to miss the whole point in relation to this movie. Which is why I've moved on from that whole thing, its only you and erasure that want to continue discussing it. Just let it go.
I think it's being taken too literally. We are never dealing in absolutes. There's no such thing as always or never. You can probably find a movie that was good or compelling that was affected by review bombing. Just as you can probably find a movie that was compelling that didn't find an audience.
