Jump ship on your own? Company doesn't need to give you a severance package.Maybe they need to make some cuts, so are hoping to see some employees jump ship so they don't have to.
Jump ship on your own? Company doesn't need to give you a severance package.Maybe they need to make some cuts, so are hoping to see some employees jump ship so they don't have to.
I find it humorous how so many on social media are thanking Iger for all of these changes. If they only knew lol
Exactly right. Chapek was basically setup for failure when Iger bailed then he weasels his way back in, points the finger at Chapek for everything wrong, and comes across looking like the almighty savior saving the day. Brilliant strategy"Thank you Iger for changing the policies you put in place. You are AMAZING!!!!"
Iger is absolutely trying to reinvent his image in 2 years. I'll say this, it's brilliant. He killed park fans for so long while making an insane amount of money, bails when it's about to get hard, then comes in and just reverses some of the stuff he did to make insane money. He keeps his money, and now is being lauded as the savior of the parks. For undoing his OWN policies.
Good read, to me it's spot on.4 Signs That Disney Parks Are in a Lot More Trouble Than People Think | Frommer's
The value of a Disney Parks vacation is getting worse, and there are concerning signs that things won't improve for many years.www.frommers.com
Interesting article I came across.
it pains me to say this, but that article is pretty much spot on4 Signs That Disney Parks Are in a Lot More Trouble Than People Think | Frommer's
The value of a Disney Parks vacation is getting worse, and there are concerning signs that things won't improve for many years.www.frommers.com
Interesting article I came across.
One of the worst takes I've seen.4 Signs That Disney Parks Are in a Lot More Trouble Than People Think | Frommer's
The value of a Disney Parks vacation is getting worse, and there are concerning signs that things won't improve for many years.www.frommers.com
Interesting article I came across.
While it's not wrong to point out that many of these policies started under Iger, nothing prevented Chapek from doing exactly what Iger's doing now and backtracking things when the response was overwhelmingly negative. Part of the problem during his tenure was that basically every announcement felt bad from a guest experience perspective. Saying he was set up disregards the fact that it was entirely within his power to do a much better job of balancing negative and positive impacts to the experience. Instead, he just barreled forward.Exactly right. Chapek was basically setup for failure when Iger bailed then he weasels his way back in, points the finger at Chapek for everything wrong, and comes across looking like the almighty savior saving the day. Brilliant strategy
Could care less about anything other than the current state of the parks- Just because you don't feel that way, doesn't mean other opinions are moot.One of the worst takes I've seen.
- Doesn't take into account Disney's problems with film and streamer productions that Chapek caused. Blaming everything on the status of the parks.
- Doesn't reflect accurately the report on people "going into debt" article (the article pointed out most people paid back the credit card debt of their Disney vacation within a year).
- A real park snob in bemoaning no new rides on the horizon as part of being "in trouble." The perpetual cry of someone who goes to the park too often and then becomes jaded over that oversaturation and demands something new all the time.
The article is an editorial... just his opinion. No more weighty than anyone's hot takes here on these forums.
They are moot if such a myopic take leads to publishing false or misleading information.Could care less about anything other than the current state of the parks- Just because you don't feel that way, doesn't mean other opinions are moot.
Sure, but the article is about the parks. Not the other divisions.They are moot if such a myopic take leads to publishing false or misleading information.
But it blames the parks solely for the fall of Chapek, which isn't true.Sure, but the article is about the parks. Not the other divisions.
Ok, cool, I don't see or read it that way. Many folks can have personal opinions of how to spend their hard-earned money.But it blames the parks solely for the fall of Chapek, which isn't true.
Yes, there are troubles with the parks, but one doesn't have to inflate those troubles into things that they're not in order to express displeasure at them.
One can legitimately complain about price increases without passing along false intimations that large swaths of people are going into long-term debt or bankruptcy over it (they're not).
When people are angry about stuff -- an anger that is justified -- they still have a tendency to way overstate their case when there is no need to. That hyperbole actually undercuts their stance since now the discussion is about those outrageous claims.
not taking up for Chapek because...well you know... but he also wasn't qualified for the job, yet Iger selected himWhile it's not wrong to point out that many of these policies started under Iger, nothing prevented Chapek from doing exactly what Iger's doing now and backtracking things when the response was overwhelmingly negative. Part of the problem during his tenure was that basically every announcement felt bad from a guest experience perspective. Saying he was set up disregards the fact that it was entirely within his power to do a much better job of balancing negative and positive impacts to the experience. Instead, he just barreled forward.
One of the worst takes I've seen.
- Doesn't take into account Disney's problems with film and streamer productions that Chapek caused. Blaming everything on the status of the parks.
- Doesn't reflect accurately the report on people "going into debt" article (the article pointed out most people paid back the credit card debt of their Disney vacation within a year).
- A real park snob in bemoaning no new rides on the horizon as part of being "in trouble." The perpetual cry of someone who goes to the park too often and then becomes jaded over that oversaturation and demands something new all the time.
The article is an editorial... just his opinion. No more weighty than anyone's hot takes here on these forums.
Problem is determining who's to blame for what.not taking up for Chapek because...well you know... but he also wasn't qualified for the job, yet Iger selected him
who knows... all I'm saying is Iger is not fixing everything Chapek did, because most of the issues began with Iger before he leftProblem is determining who's to blame for what.
Chapek was in charge of parks under Iger. So, who's responsible for policy decisions during that time?
When Chapek was CEO, Iger was Chair of the Board, and D'Amaro was in charge of parks. So, who's responsible for policy decisions during that time?
The Iger left. Chapek was still CEO and D'Amaro president of the parks. So, who's responsible for policy decisions during that time?
Now Iger's back and D'Amaro is president of the parks. So, who's responsible for policy decisions during that time? In fact, in the most recent changes, D'Amaro says that they weren't instigated by the regime change. In fact, we heard rumors of Genie+ and Park Reservation changes before Chapek was fired. So, who's responsible for policy decisions during that time?
Sing it with me, “When you wish upon a star….”Dear Iger,
undo a lot of the current mess
bring everything as it was back pre-covid
announce expansions at every park (not replacements of existing/active things)
build now and not take 5-6 years to complete
Yesdo we think many of the announcements yesterday were due to disney listening to guests, or disney listening to their data collectors and seeing vacation forecasts
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.