Chris82
Well-Known Member
I don't think it's really fair to paint Iger or Eisner in such big brushstrokes. Iger hasn't poured money into EPCOT (yet), but under his leadership, they added New Fantasyland, are adding the hugely ambitious new Pandora area to Animal Kingdom, and are about to overhaul the languishing DHS with Star Wars. I don't think someone who didn't care about the parks would make those kind of massive and risky investments. Not all of his decisions are great, by any means.
Eisner put a huge priority on the parks, and gets a lot of press for adding Disney-MGM and Animal Kingdom (and California Adventure), but his taste was far from infallible. Man, he made some bad decisions amongst the good.
It's funny referring to New Fantasyland, Pandora, and Star Wars Land as "risky," which I think in truth you're right - they are. But I thought Iger said he made these particular investments precisely because he thought they weren't as risky - relying on established franchises like Princesses, Star Wars, and a financially successful film like Avatar.