JustInTime
Well-Known Member
This thread has been derailed worse than a monorail crash on a Tuesday.
I may be out of the loop on the new Frozen bathrooms. How cold are we talking? Freezing mid stream kind of cold?
Sorry about thatThis thread has been derailed worse than a monorail crash on a Tuesday.
Dunno about you, but I find it pretty tricky to brew my own coffee while walking through EPCOT. I love Caribou, but given the choice between Starbucks and Joffrey's / Nescafe, I'll choose the former.
GMO's!! Bill Nye! Sellout!
Am I contributing yet??
It's mostly one dude sperging on about the GMO's.This thread has been derailed worse than a monorail crash on a Tuesday.
No. Guest experience.Inflation?
Well I guess we know Disney would never hire you to open this bad boy back up for business.No. Guest experience.
Big fan of the placebo effect. The people who, in quantitative measurement, get the intended therapeutic effect from the inert substance/non-intervention in comparison the the actual drug or procedure being investigated are the ones who need to be studied. A research lab in WoL?Thankfully, homeopathic tinctuers are so diluted, the probability of even one molecule of the active ingredient being present is near zero. They owe their following to the placebo effect.
Awesome. Replace Circle of Life in the Land with a film debating this and other controversial "feed the world" practices.Meanwhile, GMOs could end world hunger...
No joke, I have a coffee-snob friend who tried to do that. The first day we were there, he went to every coffeeshop in EPCOT and asked if they 'ground and tamped' their beans for espresso. Since (pre-Starbucks) they all used ESE pods, he got super frustrated at not being able to get a "proper coffee" and tried to bring his own miniature coffeemaker and heat source to the park. That didn't work so well.You mean you don't carry your own coffee maker around EPCOT?!
I could get on board with a second Starbucks location in Epcot.
With all this talk about Iger being so bad for Disney, what is the general opinion of who would be a better successor? Is there someone out there (besides yourself lol) that would be perfect to take over Disney?
I am fine with the placebo effect when it comes to things like pain management, but I have a serious issue when things like this get used in place of a legitimate treatment for a real disease thereby delaying treatment. Sugar pills are not going to cure cancer, treat Ebola or take the place of a vaccine.Big fan of the placebo effect. The people who, in quantitative measurement, get the intended therapeutic effect from the inert substance/non-intervention in comparison the the actual drug or procedure being investigated are the ones who need to be studied. A research lab in WoL?
Not to my knowledge, but I am hardly an authority on such things.Weren't there plans at one point for exactly that somewhere in the World Showcase?
I don't think it's really fair to paint Iger or Eisner in such big brushstrokes. Iger hasn't poured money into EPCOT (yet), but under his leadership, they added New Fantasyland, are adding the hugely ambitious new Pandora area to Animal Kingdom, and are about to overhaul the languishing DHS with Star Wars. I don't think someone who didn't care about the parks would make those kind of massive and risky investments. Not all of his decisions are great, by any means.Iger doesn't love theme parks.
But, and I know I've mentioned this before, that was the whole point. The original designers talked about need for constant reinvention, constant updates.
And I know I've mentioned this before as well, but the things that needed updating so far were small. Last I checked we still do not have seabases, space colonies, desert lorange farms. The overall large brush strokes of Future World were as futuristic yesterday as they are today. The small things might have needed to be updated, the clothing, a small technology here or there, but the idea of looking towards the future is still futuristic, 33 years later.
My dog and I are still waiting for our jetpacksYes, the future moves much slower in reality. Where's my hover car......
WDW also only consisted of MK, Epcot and a handful of resorts when Eisner took over. There was a huge unmet demand that required big and rapid expansion.I don't think it's really fair to paint Iger or Eisner in such big brushstrokes. Iger hasn't poured money into EPCOT (yet), but under his leadership, they added New Fantasyland, are adding the hugely ambitious new Pandora area to Animal Kingdom, and are about to overhaul the languishing DHS with Star Wars. I don't think someone who didn't care about the parks would make those kind of massive and risky investments. Not all of his decisions are great, by any means.
Eisner put a huge priority on the parks, and gets a lot of press for adding Disney-MGM and Animal Kingdom (and California Adventure), but his taste was far from infallible. Man, he made some bad decisions amongst the good.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.