Avatar (the movie) and its Sequels

Wendy Pleakley

Wendy Pleakley

Well-Known Member
LittleBuford said:
I hated the effect in The Hobbit and can’t for the life of me understand what the appeal is.
Click to expand...

I hate the "soap opera effect" on TVs and cringe whenever someone has it setup that way.

However, sounds like Cameron is approaching this in a very specific way so curious to see what it looks like.

www.cnbc.com

James Cameron's 'Avatar: The Way of Water' looks different from every movie you've ever seenâhere's why

For virtually the entire history of cinema, movies have been shot and displayed at 24 frames per second, 'Avatar' is doubling that in an entirely new way.
www.cnbc.com www.cnbc.com

These “motion grading” adjustments – which Miller hopes will one day be as common as color grading in the post-production process – allow the film to be shown in 48 frames per second so that images look crisp and detailed on bigger, brighter and better displays, but without any unusual-looking motion taking viewers out of the story.

The result is that “Avatar: The Way of Water” is the first major film to be released in a high frame rate but adjusted to keep its “cinematic” look.

In the case of the “Avatar” sequel, the action and underwater sequences will run at a higher frame rate, allowing the motion to look better and more realistic, while dramatic scenes have been adjusted to look like the traditional 24 frames per second standard that audiences are accustomed to.

“It’s a tool for the director to create the look that he or she wants shot by shot,” Miller says. “It’s used selectively. Some shots may not need the tool at all.”

The end goal is to create a seamless visual experience that maximizes the aesthetic and cinematic appeal of each shot in the film.
 
TalkingHead

TalkingHead

Well-Known Member
Wendy Pleakley said:
I hate the "soap opera effect" on TVs and cringe whenever someone has it setup that way.

However, sounds like Cameron is approaching this in a very specific way so curious to see what it looks like.

www.cnbc.com

James Cameron's 'Avatar: The Way of Water' looks different from every movie you've ever seenâhere's why

For virtually the entire history of cinema, movies have been shot and displayed at 24 frames per second, 'Avatar' is doubling that in an entirely new way.
www.cnbc.com www.cnbc.com

These “motion grading” adjustments – which Miller hopes will one day be as common as color grading in the post-production process – allow the film to be shown in 48 frames per second so that images look crisp and detailed on bigger, brighter and better displays, but without any unusual-looking motion taking viewers out of the story.

The result is that “Avatar: The Way of Water” is the first major film to be released in a high frame rate but adjusted to keep its “cinematic” look.

In the case of the “Avatar” sequel, the action and underwater sequences will run at a higher frame rate, allowing the motion to look better and more realistic, while dramatic scenes have been adjusted to look like the traditional 24 frames per second standard that audiences are accustomed to.

“It’s a tool for the director to create the look that he or she wants shot by shot,” Miller says. “It’s used selectively. Some shots may not need the tool at all.”

The end goal is to create a seamless visual experience that maximizes the aesthetic and cinematic appeal of each shot in the film.
Click to expand...
That’s absolutely not the case in the Dolby theater. It’s not seamless at all unless the local AMC somehow botched the projection, which doesn’t seem likely with a DCP.
 
Ghost93

Ghost93

Well-Known Member
TP2000 said:
I imagine Avatar 2 will have a great first weekend, there's clearly huge interest in it. Where it goes from there is a mystery to me, as that three hour plus run time seems like a problem if the story and plot isn't absolutely fabulous and it relies on alien visuals and 3D gimmicks to keep the audience entertained.

It seems to me that after the 1 hour mark, you better darn well have a story and plot that the audience is enthralled by, once the computer wizardry and 3D novelty wears off.

Three hours and ten minutes, with no intermission, is a really long time for 21st century attention spans. I still have a 20th century attention span, and I would probably wander out to the snack bar at the 90 minute mark and may not go back.
Click to expand...
Even though it was 3 hours, I was never bored. While the story is pretty standard, I think the characters are much more interesting than they were in the first film. I was emotionally invested throughout.

If you HAVE to go to the bathroom, I would recommend doing so at some point in the second hour, when the Sully family is learning how to adapt to the lifestyle of the water tribe. While these sequences are well done, they arent as essential to understanding the story like the entirety of the first hour or the exhilarating action-packed third hour.
 
Disney Analyst

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
Ghost93 said:
Even though it was 3 hours, I was never bored. While the story is pretty standard, I think the characters are much more interesting than they were in the first film. I was emotionally invested throughout.

If you HAVE to go to the bathroom, I would recommend doing so at some point in the second hour, when the Sully family is learning how to adapt to the lifestyle of the water tribe. While these sequences are well done, they arent as essential to understanding the story like the entirety of the first hour or the exhilarating action-packed third hour.
Click to expand...

Great tip! Thank you - will keep that in mind when we see it!
 
LittleBuford

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
Wendy Pleakley said:
I hate the "soap opera effect" on TVs and cringe whenever someone has it setup that way.

However, sounds like Cameron is approaching this in a very specific way so curious to see what it looks like.

www.cnbc.com

James Cameron's 'Avatar: The Way of Water' looks different from every movie you've ever seenâhere's why

For virtually the entire history of cinema, movies have been shot and displayed at 24 frames per second, 'Avatar' is doubling that in an entirely new way.
www.cnbc.com www.cnbc.com

These “motion grading” adjustments – which Miller hopes will one day be as common as color grading in the post-production process – allow the film to be shown in 48 frames per second so that images look crisp and detailed on bigger, brighter and better displays, but without any unusual-looking motion taking viewers out of the story.

The result is that “Avatar: The Way of Water” is the first major film to be released in a high frame rate but adjusted to keep its “cinematic” look.

In the case of the “Avatar” sequel, the action and underwater sequences will run at a higher frame rate, allowing the motion to look better and more realistic, while dramatic scenes have been adjusted to look like the traditional 24 frames per second standard that audiences are accustomed to.

“It’s a tool for the director to create the look that he or she wants shot by shot,” Miller says. “It’s used selectively. Some shots may not need the tool at all.”

The end goal is to create a seamless visual experience that maximizes the aesthetic and cinematic appeal of each shot in the film.
Click to expand...
That’s good to know. I’ll keep an open mind!
 
MisterPenguin

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Original Poster
CaptainAmerica said:
Also seeing reports that there are an unusually high number of presold tickets for dates outside of opening weekend.
Click to expand...
I would guess that that's mostly because of the limited IMAX theaters and people wanting to see this in IMAX.

Based on personal experience. :)
 
D

DKampy

Well-Known Member
MisterPenguin said:
I would guess that that's mostly because of the limited IMAX theaters and people wanting to see this in IMAX.

Based on personal experience. :)
Click to expand...
This is why I think this bodes well for Avatar becoming the biggest domestic grosser of 2022…average ticket prices will be higher and legs will be longer due to the demand for 3d and a quality movie screen

Plus despite what some people claimed before the release…the general population are very interest ed in The Way of Water
 
Phroobar

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
My showing tonight looks to be 2/3 full. Only the first two rows are empty. Most everyone is in the back half of the theater. Pretty typical for a good turn out.
 
Ghost93

Ghost93

Well-Known Member
CaptainAmerica said:
Dolby Cinema > IMAX if you've got it.

But yep. I wanted Dolby Cinema, 3D, reserved reclined seat, centered left-to-right, three rows from the back. So I'm going 12/23.
Click to expand...
I saw it in Dolby since I wanted the comfy reclining seats, especially with the three-hour runtime.

I didn't really notice the high frame rate. Maybe it's because the film is almost entirely CGI, the movie didn't feel like a movie set in the way high frame rates have hurt other films.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom