Prototype82
Well-Known Member
But it's not activated by people walking over it, is it?Or even the same technology thats used towards the entrance in Epcot, which may be the same thing.
But it's not activated by people walking over it, is it?Or even the same technology thats used towards the entrance in Epcot, which may be the same thing.
But it's not activated by people walking over it, is it?
On a slightly different note is this the biggest thread to date on this forum? Just curious.:lol:
This has been fun, but I've got to go get some things done.
If I hadn't come accross this thread and its hundred+ pages, I might be done by now.:ROFLOL:
I'm scared to think how long it'll be when I get home tonight at 7PM pacific.
I'm gonna guess.................ummmmmm..................148 pages.
Carry on.
I'm a Star Wars Fanatic.
Saw it 11 times in the theatre in 1977.
And hundreds of times since.
But it all honesty, it's a pretty simple story.
In fact, the basic storyline was one of its criticisms back in the day, and a major reason Oscar voters gave Woody Allen's 'Annie Hall' the Best Picture Oscar over 'Star Wars' that year.
I'm not saying it was justified, obviously it wasn't.
But 'A New Hope' was hardly powerful storytelling.
Lucas got much deeper with the story in 'Empire Strikes Back'.(which surpisingly I only saw 6 times in theatre)
I'm hoping the 'Avatar' sequel follows this path.
Cameron showed with 'Titanic' that he knows how to weave a story.
My point is, it was the "World" created in Star Wars that made it so popular.
Just like Avatar.
What would be the point of that? It doesn't mean people can't still enjoy it years from now if the name is still there.I was just thinking, hopefully they will build it so it can be easily de-Avatared into a more generic alien planet just in case the franchise doesn't pan out.
You're kidding right?
People did fall in love with the atmosphere of Star Wars - but the story was there, the characters, etc. That's why its still a classic. Other people born after the 1977 awe factor of the film, STILL enjoy it because of the story. Thats why there is a huge fan base for decades. Avatar was 8,000 hours of boringness. It's not a classic yet for crying out loud, so stop treating it like it is one! In 30 years, its effects is gonna be no big deal, most likely. Will it still be a classic then? Who the hell knows! People on this board, who LOVE the Avatar land have already said they hated the movie. So lets stop arguing if the movie is good or not. Cause it wasnt a hit across the board, for everyone.
I think you are misunderstanding me.
Thats where we are. I'm simply asking if we can agree to disagree.It's pretty clear that everyone who agrees with me has long left this thread, and I need to as well. Unfortunately I'm very bored at work and its hard to pull myself away :lol:
I think you are misunderstanding me.
When I say "story" I do not mean that its some original draw dropping hair ripping out crazy story. I mean, that the story (the characters, the script, the "WORLD" as you put it...) that's the "story". AVATAR was a hit because of the CGI/Special Effects. The story just was not there, in many peoples opinions. It wasn't a well written film, it was too long, etc etc. I KNOW that has no bearing on the land, but this is what this argument has turned into. It went from me simply saying I didn't like Avatarland, and I didnt think it had the fan base...to now we're debating if the film is any good.
Thats where we are. I'm simply asking if we can agree to disagree.It's pretty clear that everyone who agrees with me has long left this thread, and I need to as well. Unfortunately I'm very bored at work and its hard to pull myself away :lol:
Use steel reinforcing to make the islands protrude out of a wall of rockwork, have it over a body of water, have the pump system for a waterfall...I think as a backdrop, that could be convincing. If the ride building for Avatar's flagship attraction is huge(which I'd imagine it would be) it would be the perfect theming to disguise it.I can't wait to see how they handle the floating islands...
My guess is this will be a combination of several things. Honey I shrunk the kids style outdoor area, ET Adventure style que area for indoor, jurassic park style building construction to give the illusion of a long term structure, and the inclusion of several large plants so not everything seems artificial. The outdoor attractions will consist of a dumbo style spinner, a mini navi village, and an animatronic zoo. The indoor portion will probably be a simulator ride or maybe an indoor/outdoor coaster. Either way this should be decent enough for disney to rely on once fantasy land and harry potter start to fade from the interests of the general public.
But I would love to see a fiberglass built dome around the Avatar land. It'll be naked to the eye. This way, during the night, they can include these type of projections upon the dome...
No my friend Avatar was hit because of the beauty and grace of that of which was Pandora. The fact that nearly everything in the movie was CGI is incredible, and how surreal the world feels is just jaw dropping. The world of Pandora is like a beautiful Dali painting come to life. It's abstract, different, alien, yet so incredible. It's a world where you wish to abide in, and when a film can do that, then it's doing some very few films have done in the past century (ie Star Wars, LOTR, Finding Nemo, Cabbage Patch Kids).
Avatards.
They walk among us.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.