Quote:
Originally Posted by
WDW1974
If someone chooses to not believe the facts, they're choosing ignorance, which is a town many people enjoy living in.
Not really. They are making a decision based on the evidence provided that the person presented the material is trustworthy enough to have their facts be taken. With regards to you, the evidence is not there for me. That is my choice and you may be correct, but at this point, I am not convinced you say who you are. That's my deal not yours.
We can go back and forth on this (and apparently will) ad nauseum. Facts are facts. Some people just choose not to listen because they don't like the source or it doesn't fit their world or World views.
I don't know what 'evidence' you believe is supposed to be here about me. I apparently didn't get the files on you, either.
I really don't know how to respond when you say you aren't convinced I am who I say I am since I have NEVER said and will NEVER say who I am online ... and if I did, I very, very, very much doubt you'd have a clue who I was anyway.
Sorry, I don't get it ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WDW1974
C'mon, you do realize how dumb that sounds, don't you?
Debate is all about opinion ... sometimes you're lucky and get a few facts tossed in ... and there are people who still won't listen even if you put facts out there. They'd rather believe what a bus driver told them or what they saw on another fan forum.
Then it is not a debate worth having. Saying one opinion is valid and the other is not based on no facts is ridiculous and doesn't forward any conversation. You and I can go back and forth all day on the number of people upset about dining prices, but unless we have data then the point is moot.
I am glad you are the arbiter of debates worth having or not. The whole point of a discussion board is giving opinions. Very rarely will I say someone's opinion isn't valid. That's generally not a way to have discussion.
No, I don't know the number of folks who aren't pleased with Disney dining prices. Neither do you. And neither does Disney.
But that doesn't mean they don't exist (I think even you wouldn't argue that) ... and it certainly doesn't mean you can't discuss the fact that SOME people aren't happy with Mickey's food gouging anymore than I'd say you can't discuss the fact some people (many likely) feel they're getting a deal on the DDP.
As I've said before, if you had to go strictly by cold hard facts we never would have had one political debate in this country.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WDW1974
When you accuse someone of namedropping and (or do what that UK poster did and ASSume that I was unhappy with D23 because Disney doesn't show loyalty to its best customers) then it certainly IS personal.
It may be an accusation, but it is grounded in fact, but what you have quoted me here is taken out of context. I never accused you about calling D23 a failure. Apologies if I inadvertantly did. I did say that you namedrop and I will stand behind that.
I love the political flipflopping ... you did accuse me of being a namedropper (and with a negative connotation). That is personal. I don't namedrop. If I know someone or know of someone involved in something, I mention it if I believe it has relevance. That apparently makes some people here feel insignificant ... have no idea why. I don't drool when Tony Baxter or Joe Rohde walks into a room. People are people. Period.
As to D23, you did group a bunch of folks in the 'never happy no matter what Disney does' category ... and I'm pretty sure you believe I am one of them (if so, you're quite wrong).
I have never called D23 a failure except in PR circles where it didn't get the buzz expected.
Of course, I never called DCA a failure either.
D23 isn't for me, but I'll buy the fanzine since I have Barnes and Noble cards I'd like to use before they go under.
I believe it won't exist in five years in its current form, but who knows ... it could morph into something better or just fade away.
But I won't call it a failure at this point (that would be like all those ripping the Prez when he hasn't even been in office two months and has someone else's messes to clean up).
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WDW1974
As to the baiting part, I have no idea what you are talking about.
Here let me quote it for you:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WDW1974
~Marty Sklar grills a great burger!~
Yeah ... do you have a point? You made a comment about not wanting to know what exec cookouts I've been to. I've never mentioned going to one. YOU bait and don't like it when I respond? Sorry ... and he really does grill a great burger.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WDW1974
Just because you have complaints with say a loved one ... it doesn't make you not love them anymore (or maybe in your case it does, I dunno).
WDW isn't a loved one. It is a place run by a corporation. To hold a place in such high regard as a family member is unfortunate. Maybe that is just me.
Again, you are taking the comment literally to deliberately (it would appear) not get the underlying point.
I don't hold WDW or any place on a level with loved ones. The point was simply, as you damn well know, that you may not be happy with someone you love, but you don't just dessert them.
It's a very basic point ... I love WDW, but that doesn't mean I am happy with every aspect of it ... it doesn't mean I can't about those aspects on an online forum ... and it doesn't mean I can't still enjoy all the other aspects of the place.
~Will trade a cousin for a week at the Poly~