any harry potter fans?

Dizknee_Phreek

Dizknee_Phreek

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Originally posted by dadisneynutter
Lol, oh yeah, and in an interview, someone asked Rowling if she was going to write books about harry after he leaves the school and she replied "who says he's going to live that long?" :eek:
Click to expand...

Ooooohhhh! GOOOOOD answer! though i hope she was only joking.
 
Dizknee_Phreek

Dizknee_Phreek

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Originally posted by MKCustodial
...and Rupert's face of fear is PRICELESS!!! :lol:
Click to expand...

LOL!!! you're so right! the womping willow scene was great! one of my favorites in the Chambers movie for sure!! :D
 
Dizknee_Phreek

Dizknee_Phreek

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Originally posted by dadisneynutter
But, I was thinking, if Gandalf fought Dumbledore, who do you think would win?
Click to expand...

well, as much as i hate to admit it, i'd say Dumbledore. Gandalf is certainly wonderful, and as much as i love him (though i've taken a great liking to Dumbledore's gentleness), his powers just seem kind of limited to me (though that may change after Fellowship, i just don't know yet...i'm trying to not know so then i'll be surprised during the upcoming movies) so, for now, Dumbledore.
 
Pumbas Nakasak

Pumbas Nakasak

Heading for the great escape.
Originally posted by MKCustodial
I did, pretty funny, really!

So Hooch was cut because she wanted more? Man, I hate when people let fame cloud their better judgement...



.
Click to expand...

Shes actually the daughter of a director and producer so I dont think thats the motive. Shes also the star of a rather popular BBC sitcom.
 
Pumbas Nakasak

Pumbas Nakasak

Heading for the great escape.
I was implying thats shes from a wealthy family, and has experienced some degree of success since her move into comedy. She may have felt that given the mediocrity of the first film why would the second be such an improvement.

At the end of the day was her part really missed, I think not.
 
isnet396

isnet396

New Member
The wages in the first film were pretty low. Dan, Rupert, and Emma made a combined $330,000. I think the Screan Actor's Guild stepped in and CoS upped them to $3,000,000. Next one's gonna be $5 million each.


Ian
 
MKCustodial

MKCustodial

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by isnet396
The wages in the first film were pretty low. Dan, Rupert, and Emma made a combined $330,000. I think the Screan Actor's Guild stepped in and CoS upped them to $3,000,000. Next one's gonna be $5 million each.


Ian
Click to expand...

Anothe reason for them to stay for all 7. They'll have enough cash to pay around for the rest of their lives if they don't ever wanna work again, and they can always live off conventions like Shatner, right? :lol:
 
E

Erika

Moderator
Originally posted by MKCustodial
...You know, especially after the movies, I feel like the series should be renamed to "Ron Weasley and the Philosopher's Stone". He's the best, and Rupert's face of fear is PRICELESS!!! :lol:
Click to expand...

I agree! Ron is the best. :sohappy:

I thought the second movie was much better donethan the first. I really loved it. I don't know that I can wait until 2004 for the next one. I'll have to give them a call and ask them to step it up a little. ;)
 
MKCustodial

MKCustodial

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by disney_nutter
ok jason will not be in the 3rd film due to his comitments on the new film neverland but hopes to come back in the 4th film
Click to expand...
Well, Malfoy is only mentioned in "Prisoner", orchestrating the downfall of Buckbeak, so it's ok for him not to show up... And Peeves doesn't have a big role in this one as well, but they sure should have included him in "Chamber", and at least add his deleted scenes to the "Stone" DVD.
 
tenchu

tenchu

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by MKCustodial
Right, I remember reading about that in college... Hey, cool! Thanks, Skirt Boy!
Click to expand...

Not a problem.

Thats just the sort of wee things that people miss in the films.
 
MKCustodial

MKCustodial

Well-Known Member
I read this week that they're making some tests to see if it's feasable to use Richard Harris' double's body and then insert his face digitally.

As far as I know, they should just get a new actor.
 
WDWFREAK53

WDWFREAK53

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by MKCustodial
I read this week that they're making some tests to see if it's feasable to use Richard Harris' double's body and then insert his face digitally.

As far as I know, they should just get a new actor.
Click to expand...

In my opinion...they should do this...if it's feasible...because he would've wanted to have been in this movie. (but only if they can do it right)
 
tenchu

tenchu

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by WDWFREAK53
In my opinion...they should do this...if it's feasible...because he would've wanted to have been in this movie. (but only if they can do it right)
Click to expand...

No, i think they should just get another actor.

I mean, its a bit different from finishing gladiator after Oliver Reed had died.
 
MKCustodial

MKCustodial

Well-Known Member
These are fresh news:

1. Richard Harris' family wants WB to offer the role of Dumbleore to his good (drinking) friend Peter O'Toole.

2. Apparently, Gary Oldman will be Sirius Black, already negotiating for "Prisoner" and "Goblet".
 
Dizknee_Phreek

Dizknee_Phreek

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
thanks for the new info, MK!
my sister told me of a guy who supposedly was going to be Dumbledore...she heard/read about it on E!. but she later found out that he had never signed on and E! had just jumped to conclusions. i wish i could remember the guy's name! he's played on something before, but my memory fails me at the moment.
Peter O'Toole, eh? i KNOW i know that name from somewhere, but what movies has he been in?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom