SirGoofy
Member
The entire place was showing it's age.
How? It's the least "stale" of WDW's parks. LS, Land, Imagination, TT, and M:S are less than 10 years old for the most part. Not to mention El Rio's major refurb recently.:shrug:
The entire place was showing it's age.
The park is a money maker with F&G as well as F&W. People love Soarin and TT. M:S still draws people. ROE still packs in the crowds at night.
If you're talking the entire concept of having sponsored pavilions and what to do with UOE and the former WoL, then that is a problem. But its a problem that doesn't have to be addressed now. Its something that can be addressed within 5 years.
There's a lot of unused space in Epcot but really doesn't seem to be affecting park attendance/operations at the moment.
DHS needs the most help.
Yes, but what message is being convayed? It's not cohesive, and it's theme is askew.How? It's the least "stale" of WDW's parks. LS, Land, Imagination, TT, and M:S are less than 10 years old for the most part. Not to mention El Rio's major refurb recently.:shrug:
Exactly. Though, I would like to see it corrected sooner.The park is a money maker with F&G as well as F&W. People love Soarin and TT. M:S still draws people. ROE still packs in the crowds at night.
If you're talking the entire concept of having sponsored pavilions and what to do with UOE and the former WoL, then that is a problem. But its a problem that doesn't have to be addressed now. Its something that can be addressed within 5 years.
There's a lot of unused space in Epcot but really doesn't seem to be affecting park attendance/operations at the moment.
DHS needs the most help.
How? It's the least "stale" of WDW's parks. LS, Land, Imagination, TT, and M:S are less than 10 years old for the most part. Not to mention El Rio's major refurb recently.:shrug:
I think World Showcase is perfect.
Future world seems lost, I really can't put my finger on it though. :shrug:
Your right.Its the sponsored pavilion concept of going to a theme park. They have an empty pavilion (WoL) and another one that could easily be changed (UoE).
The general idea is what to do with them?
What to do?! Re-haul FW to be a unified and cohesive place again. Stop having the architecture and the colors clash. Keep all the attractions focused on the future.Its the sponsored pavilion concept of going to a theme park. They have an empty pavilion (WoL) and another one that could easily be changed (UoE).
The general idea is what to do with them?
Keep all the attractions focused on the future.
Easy, IMHO.
What if they are based on Walt's vision of the future.But this last part isn't easy. Especially in today's world. The future is literally changing every day. New technology emerges in the areas covered all the time, there's no way to build an attraction that can stay relevant for long in today's technological society.
What if they are based on Walt's vision of the future.
Since Epcot is homage to his last dream.
Trust me, if they were to build things in the style of something that could be timless (almost like Horizons, save for the fashion!( and easily update-able, it would work fine.But this last part isn't easy. Especially in today's world. The future is literally changing every day. New technology emerges in the areas covered all the time, there's no way to build an attraction that can stay relevant for long in today's technological society.
Someone else get it.What if they are based on Walt's vision of the future.
Since Epcot is homage to his last dream.
Sure, if you want Disney to slack off, be generic, mediocre, and fail.:shrug::hurl:Yea, but even Walt's vision of the future would look fairly dated at this point.
Personally, the area needs a name change.
Trust me, if they were to build things in the style of something that could be timless (almost like Horizons, save for the fashion!( and easily update-able, it would work fine.
Haven't you heard? Being 80's is in now.Yea, but even Walt's vision of the future would look fairly dated at this point.
Personally, the area needs a name change.
Sure, if you want Disney to slack off, be generic, mediocre, and fail.:shrug::hurl:
It could be like a oversized museum.
So...
Excatly what a theme park should not be.
I think the foundation of Epcot was to be like a permanent World's Fair, not a theme park.
Someone else get it.
So then update them. You are thinking like TDO. The show needs to be maintained.But then you run the risk of the rides becoming incredibly stale. The Future World concept was great and ground breaking, but fundamentally flawed from inception.
And that's realistic? I would think every 5 years, and not even, if they were to do things right.
Sorry, but at some point reality needs to enter the discussion, and having to change basically every ride in the park every other year to keep them up to date is not a reality.
Besides, no part of FW is currently mediocre other than Imagination.
It's supposed to be both.So...
I think the foundation of Epcot was to be like a permanent World's Fair, not a theme park.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.