NothingRhymeswithOrange
Well-Known Member
Everest has double the throughput of Dinosaur, or triple if they're dealing with creepers or have a station closed on Dinosaur.
Once Pandora opens, if they turned Dinoland into an acceptable land then they'd have 4 excellent lands with an e-ticket anchor in each corner of the park. I really don't think AK needs to use any more land, they really just need to have people fan out beyond Africa and Asia. Camp Minnie/Mickey and Dinoland were/are the obvious areas of the parks that most people skipped or spent very little time in. Pandora solves one side, and maybe Dinoland/Dinosaur will be fixed on the other side.
Do people really find Dinosaur an acceptable e-ticket EMV though? It's probably the biggest waste of a great ride system this side of Antarctica over at Sea World. Guests never seem overly thrilled by the ride -I hear more negative comments than positive ones whenever I'm there. I personally HATE the attraction. I've probably done Kilimanjaro and Everest 20-30 times a year yet I have to drag myself to Dinosaur to do it once a year. Bad queue, bad preshow/story, dimly lit scenes with a few ferns and some impressive AA's. Not even a decent onride soundtrack despite Dinosaurs superb movie score! Instead I hear some idiot screaming and a computer voice narrating dinosaurs names into the speakers- ugh! I'd trade it all for a straight up clone of TDS's Indy even without their amazing queue (DL's fire effects wouldn't be cost effective and TDS's alternative effects are good anyway).
Currently there are other parks in need of much more then AK. With Avatar opening next year its going to be a long time until AK gets another big project. DHS is happening now with other projects "supposed" to happen, Epcot is supposedly next with MK after that. I agree with you that Dinoland needs more. Everyone love dinosaurs, so a revamp of that land should definitely at the top of the list of possible projects.