Actually, I'm going to go out on a limb and defend MC. They definitely were first with most/all of the 60th info and very accurate to boot. Any other insider, yourself included, has mostly confirmed what they've had to say after the fact.
We aren't talking generalizations either, they gave very specific dates, small nuanced projects (such as the Hatbox ghost, new Harold AA's, Grizzly Air Field updates), down to colours of the castle bunting and discussion of all three major entertainment offerings (although I think you were first with Paint the Nights).
I'm not going to go back and try and see when I first mentioned things because I have better things to do (like scratching myself down there). They certainly had many of the details of things before anyone. But I mentioned all the new night entertainment probably well over a year ago, possibly 18 months or so. Again, it doesn't matter very much except to my ego when my breaks get downplayed (or people lose them in 650-page threads so they don't count!)
They were definitely the first to break the Luigi's Flying Tires Re-do.
That they were. Although it was very easy to see that Luigi's was the Rocket Rods of DCA 2.0.
If they end up being true, they also were the first to talk about Star Wars for Toontown and Marvel for DCA (including the upgrade to an RnRC type Iron Man attraction).
Absolutely, on the Marvel in DCA deal. Not so sure about Toontown, but again ... how much does it matter?
You yourself know that things fluctuate, and I think MC takes way too much flack for the early reveal of Star Wars for tomorrowland... which we basically know at this point was true at the time. Iger himself has confirmed in an interview he pulled the plug at the last minute to wait on the sequels. They were always quite clear the Subs were in limbo for months and months until Disney made up their mind. MC can't be blamed that Disney didn't pull the trigger.
I also believe the complete redo of all 5 classics was a likely possibility at the time when they first started discussing it a year or so ago, after all we've seen two of those eek out already.
I don't think MC has bad sources... I think Disney just can't make up it's damned mind in today's day and age and constantly get cold feet on all their projects/announcements.
I've said Micechat was correct about SW for Tomorrowland originally and closing the subs down. Things chaged, but they had the story right. And the full makeovers for the dark rides was something I had as well and I believe it just became a budget deal. I'm quite sure that between the new MK queue and the DL enhancements that most of that will be part of SDL's Peter Pan attraction come 2016.
As to the sources, I am pretty confident in saying they lost two major ones in the last few years. And it has made a difference.