hopemax
Well-Known Member
Yet, since the early 1970's, I've loved the parks. The rides, the lands, their design, their history...all of that.
Back then, characters and 'toons were not a major part of the experience. Sure, you might stumble on a character (Just recently found an old one of a 5yr old me and a Robin Hood, who even back then I knew was just a guy in a suit.) but it was a surprise, not a expectation. You might ride an attraction with a 'toon tie-in, but it was the exception, not the norm.
Much of my frustration with the current direction of the parks likely has to do with my rejection of the idea that everything has to promote the brand or sell a plush or rehash the plot of a movie I have no fondness for.
Keep your Frozen nonsense. I'll be over here riding Jungle Cruise and Haunted Mansion.
Thus all the conversation about what is "Disney." And while the younger crowd goes nuts over All Star Movies, and the older would rather stroll along the banks of the Sassagoula River. That was part of my point of an earlier post, that old Disney looked outward, found something interesting, and put their own little twist on it. This Disney, is so IP driven, and looking outward is almost even "bad." Eventually, you can't look outside, even if you wanted to, because there will be a whine, "but that's not Disney." So I do wonder when things like HM, Pirates or WDW's Small World transition from "classic Disney" to "weirdly out of place, not Disney at all." (already seen it in trip reports on the DIS). They'll throw in characters when the can, remove what is to expensive to operate, and then you've taken a multi-tool and turned it into a screwdriver.