Which, in your opinion is better and why? We're planing on taking DD to 1900 Park Fare, but heard Cinderellas Royal Table was very nice and also requires 2 DDP table service credits. Is it worth it, or will 1900 be good enough???
We've done both and prefer the experience at CRT by far.
We've had breakfast, lunch and dinner at CRT. Our favorite was lunch followed by breakfast. We did not enjoy our food at dinner as much, but we still enjoyed the atmosphere.
We thought the food at 1900 was okay (we've only been to dinner). I'm glad we did it once, but we probably will not do it again unless they change the characters.
Ideally I'd say try them both out, but if you can only pick one I would do CRT, especially if she wants to meet more princesses.
I've always been baffled at how many people do not like CRT. It is one of our favorite places (for lunch and breakfast) on property.
Not only do we think the food is good, but the experience of eating in the castle is great, especially if you get lucky and end up with a table overlooking Fantasy Land.
Another option for you is the princess meals at Akershus at Epcot, but we still like CRT better than that. However, I did like Akershus (breakfast) much better than 1900.
Do both places count as two table service meals?
Agreed. I remember the days when it was just a plain TS restaurant and you could have a nice quiet meal there.Character meal killed Cinderella's Royal Table.:fork:
Stupid character meals......
Never been to 1900 Park Fare.
Which, in your opinion is better and why? We're planing on taking DD to 1900 Park Fare, but heard Cinderellas Royal Table was very nice and also requires 2 DDP table service credits. Is it worth it, or will 1900 be good enough???
If you want to go to dinner, Cinderella is no longer at the castle for dinner.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.