kong1802
Well-Known Member
Here’s the thing. The things that are unproven are the measures we put in place in March and kept in place for months. We threw out decades of epidemiological knowledge in an instant. It’s terrifying.
That's how I felt when they started throwing the world's epidemiological expert with decades of experience to the side because he said things they didn't like......terrifying isn't it?
What makes me confident is what’s staring us all in the face. Sweden’s epidemic is over. The sunbelt is very clearly coming out of their’s. No lockdowns. New York and New Jersey aren’t spiking, aren’t surging, and if you’ve been here, you know it’s not from some compliance with distancing or mask mandates.
Jury is still out on most countries. Aside from a few sensational opinion articles, that is. From what I've read and looked at they have had a harder time than neighboring countries. But there are a lot of factors that need to be analyzed. And from what I understand they did have a lockdown, but it was more voluntary.
It's easy to take a quick headline and run with it, but that doesn't make sound policy or account for differing variables.
Hospitals were never over run in the south. There were deaths, sure, but there always are. I believe they saved lives in the long and medium term. By not locking down, by not panicking, by allowing people to function as human beings. Btw, this was always the plan for managing an epidemic. Until March that is. It’s the right way to do it.
That's such a flippant way to look at it. "There were deaths, sure". Not sure how you type that out with a straight face honestly. You could say that about any safety issue, couldn't you?
We did lockdown for the most part. Schools were closed. Non essentials closed. Did you not see any of that?