• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Happy Holidays from WDWMAGIC

    Wishing you a season filled with warmth, time with the people you care about, and a little extra Disney magic. Thanks for being part of the WDWMAGIC community. We appreciate you reading, sharing, and talking Disney with us all year.

  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Splash Mountain re-theme announced

Status
Not open for further replies.

kong1802

Well-Known Member
Then NBC are cowards if they used a question (and subsequent "outrage") as a means for an "out" to get rid of her due to low ratings.

To be honest, knowing her origins at Fox, I'm not quite sure why they approached her and green-lit a program. (Her for the $$$ but them for what reason? Ratings? Stirring the pot? The Controversy of her as a polarizing figure?)

And we all know how talk show hosts kick around questions to their guests to gauge reactions, get responses, etc., so I don't buy the whole "she should have known." It was a discussion. We can all agree that worse has been said on TV.

No argument there....

It was not to the egregious level to deserve a firing. The apology and learning moment should have been enough.

I just don't put this one on the mob per se...I think it was the suits in this instance.
 

21stamps

Well-Known Member
I can't anything she says seriously given how she used sex so blatantly to promote herself when she was at Fox... I mean she pretty much did all she could to set back women's rights as much as possible. Her clothes always seemed more appropriate for a cocktail party than for a news program. It as a bit like watching Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct half the time.

That’s the exact opposite of who she is and what she did!!!

Wearing a tight dress is setting women back?
Saying what women should or shouldn’t wear is completely sexist. She was never remotely inappropriately dressed. She literally refused Roger Alies when so many women were too afraid to do so, she became the highest paid and most watched female on the channel (and any cable news channel), because she earned it, worked for it. That’s not ‘setting women back’. It’s exactly the opposite.
 

orlandogal22

Well-Known Member
That’s the exact opposite of who she is and what she did!!!

Wearing a tight dress is setting women back?

Not to get into it as I know you're not talking directly to me, but I don't believe the tight dress was setting women back per se.

But, as an example of Kelly's wardrobe selection at the RNC. Black, low cut, spaghetti straps. Just didn't look appropriate to me. It looked like thomas998 said - it was more cocktail hour ... OR, for me, did she forget her blazer? sweater? was she wearing a bathing suit? 😂

1593462382393.png
 

kong1802

Well-Known Member
Not to get into it as I know you're not talking directly to me, but I don't believe the tight dress was setting women back per se.

But, as an example of Kelly's wardrobe selection at the RNC. Black, low cut, spaghetti straps. Just didn't look appropriate to me. It looked like thomas998 said - it was more cocktail hour ... OR, for me, did she forget her blazer? sweater? was she wearing a bathing suit? 😂

View attachment 480385

I'm on a work computer guys....lol
 

orlandogal22

Well-Known Member
No argument there....

It was not to the egregious level to deserve a firing. The apology and learning moment should have been enough.

I just don't put this one on the mob per se...I think it was the suits in this instance.

I edited my reply to something else I remembered re: Whoopi and Joy Behar.

However, indeed, I can agree that it did not deserve a firing.

And really, I'm not looking for Kimmel, Fallon, etc. to be fired or "cancelled" either. I just think things should be fair - and if people are going to start going around as the "thought and intent cancel police," there cannot be any evidence of hypocrisy.
 

kong1802

Well-Known Member
I edited my reply to something else I remembered re: Whoopi and Joy Behar.

However, indeed, I can agree that it did not deserve a firing.

And really, I'm not looking for Kimmel, Fallon, etc. to be fired or "cancelled" either. I just think things should be fair - and if people are going to start going around as the "thought and intent cancel police," there cannot be any evidence of hypocrisy.

I get that. I really do. As a liberal I always concede that "my" side has more influence and representation in media (TV, movies, print), and gets way more leeway with the republic.

I think intent is unfairly attributed to people, a lot of the time. Those who are liked get a pass "they didn't mean it" and those who aren't well liked obviously meant every word or thing that they did.....

I don't know how we fix that, but I hope we do.
 

The Grand Inquisitor

Well-Known Member
I will have to disagree with you about Disney going cheap, the main reason they are doing this is to reduce operating costs, maintenance upkeep on both these attractions are very expensive. AA's are expensive to maintain, so they may add some new AA figures but I'm guessing more of the Little Mermaid ride style. I think WDW Splash Mountain has 59 AA figures and I'm sure it will end up less than ten.

They are just giving it this politically correct excuse now because it fits, but it always about the money!! not what guests want.
I guess it's possible. It's me being an optimist I guess :) This is really big news, I have friends who aren't Disney fans and have heard the news. This will be a really big thing for Disney. Especially since Splash Mountain was one of the most popular rides. I truly bet this ride is going to be awesome.
 
Last edited:

Donaldfan1934

Well-Known Member
The timing certainly isn’t coincidental, but a single petition with relatively few signatures isn’t going to prompt such a major move, particularly when no-one was expecting Disney to spend money on any inessential projects. Whether the idea was already in the works or not, Disney decided of its own volition that this was the best move in the long run, as well as something that could earn them some positive PR in the current moment.
You do realize the entire notion of Disney’s decision not being the result of people’s demands is predicated on whether or not the idea was already in the works, right? And even if it was, like you said, the timing certainly isn’t coincidental. In my opinion, while I can believe this idea may have existed within WDI given the direction things have been going the past few years, it was either not already green lit or early enough in development where it was of no immediate concern. So, at least to some degree, Disney is in fact directly reacting to the demands of a relative few.
 

21stamps

Well-Known Member
Not to get into it as I know you're not talking directly to me, but I don't believe the tight dress was setting women back per se.

But, as an example of Kelly's wardrobe selection at the RNC. Black, low cut, spaghetti straps. Just didn't look appropriate to me. It looked like thomas998 said - it was more cocktail hour ... OR, for me, did she forget her blazer? sweater? was she wearing a bathing suit? 😂

View attachment 480385


I actually love that she wore this outfit, completely respect her for it.

Who made a rule that because women are in traditional male fields, that they must give up their femininity and dress more similar to men? It’s a stereotype that I have always bulked at.

I’m blonde, was always toned (until recently), and I‘ve spent my career wearing pencil skirts, dresses, slim pants, and 3.5-4” heels. I love it. There’s a certain self empowerment in it, for me. To walk into a meeting with men in suits, being prejudged because I’m a blonde in high heels., and then kicking butt. Same with a client, I loved to be eye height or close to it, with my male clients, to not be what they would typically expect.

Megyn totally kicked butt that night at the RNC, in a spaghetti strap dress. We don’t need to be wearing pantsuits to do a job.

I don’t know.. I can’t describe it, but I think it’s one more stereotype that women can shatter.. and no, that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t own blazers and pantsuits too. Just that we can wear what we feel good in that day. Turn a stereotype on its head.
 

orlandogal22

Well-Known Member
I actually love that she wore this outfit, completely respect her for it.

Who made a rule that because women are in traditional male fields, that they must give up their femininity and dress more similar to men? It’s a stereotype that I have always bulked at.

I’m blonde, was always toned (until recently), and I‘ve spent my career wearing pencil skirts, dresses, slim pants, and 3.5-4” heels. I love it. There’s a certain self empowerment in it, for me. To walk into a meeting with men in suits, being prejudged because I’m a blonde in high heels., and then kicking butt. Same with a client, I loved to be eye height or close to it, with my male clients, to not be what they would typically expect.

Megyn totally kicked butt that night at the RNC, in a spaghetti strap dress. We don’t need to be wearing pantsuits to do a job.

I don’t know.. I can’t describe it, but I think it’s one more stereotype that women can shatter.. and no, that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t own blazers and pantsuits too. Just that we can wear what we feel good in that day.

I don't think it's trying to shatter a stereotype so much as it was a very interesting, shall we say, wardrobe choice.

I am a woman (obviously) and, in all reality, could care less what Megyn wears regularly BUT it made ME feel a tad uncomfortable watching her that night with her bare shoulders, cleavage, etc. Because - to be blunt - it looked odd and out of place.

Sure, women can wear what they want. I do! But would you be OK with spaghetti straps and a low-cut black v-neck little bitty dress when you're meeting the pope? At your relative's funeral? At church? At a baby shower?

I just thought it was out of place. Just a simple observation. :)
 

ImperfectPixie

Well-Known Member
I don't think it's trying to shatter a stereotype so much as it was a very interesting, shall we say, wardrobe choice.

I am a woman (obviously) and, in all reality, could care less what Megyn wears regularly BUT it made ME feel a tad uncomfortable watching her that night with her bare shoulders, cleavage, etc. Because - to be blunt - it looked odd and out of place.

Sure, women can wear what they want. I do! But would you be OK with spaghetti straps and a low-cut black v-neck little bitty dress when you're meeting the pope? At your relative's funeral? At church? At a baby shower?

I just thought it was out of place. Just a simple observation. :)
I agree. There are appropriate places and times for different styles of clothing.
 

21stamps

Well-Known Member
I don't think it's trying to shatter a stereotype so much as it was a very interesting, shall we say, wardrobe choice.

I am a woman (obviously) and, in all reality, could care less what Megyn wears regularly BUT it made ME feel a tad uncomfortable watching her that night with her bare shoulders, cleavage, etc. Because - to be blunt - it looked odd and out of place.

Sure, women can wear what they want. I do! But would you be OK with spaghetti straps and a low-cut black v-neck little bitty dress when you're meeting the pope? At your relative's funeral? At church? At a baby shower?

I just thought it was out of place. Just a simple observation. :)

I can’t remember her exact words, but I remember her saying something about doing it intentionally.. because she was so often called a blonde bimbo.
She picked her most feminine outfit, and went and slayed- I remember those words. I thought it was such a power in-your-face move.
 

The Grand Inquisitor

Well-Known Member
I can’t remember her exact words, but I remember her saying something about doing it intentionally.. because she was so often called a blonde bimbo.
She picked her most feminine outfit, and went and slayed- I remember those words. I thought it was such a power in-your-face move.
Here's an article with Megyn explaining her choice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom