ToTBellHop
Well-Known Member
I don’t care if you’re the Queen of England! If you wanna ride, you wake up early for your BG!I think after all the work he did for the kids to come to WDW he deserves it
I don’t care if you’re the Queen of England! If you wanna ride, you wake up early for your BG!I think after all the work he did for the kids to come to WDW he deserves it
The rumor is just for Rise of the Resistance.
I know the leak. It’s really stupid.
And Anakin doing it wasn’t a problem until the how of it was explained many years later. Until RotS it could’ve easily been assumed that Force Ghosts were just Jedi you personally knew and were able to appear to you or something like that.
All the highly technical Star Wars discussion that only hardcore fans would understand and I just want to learn to yowl like Chewie to telemarketers...
So, Gary Sinise rode RotR today...but HE didn’t have to show up at 5:15 for a Boarding Group! Not cool. So to the Smith family from Minnesota that was the first family to arrive at DHS today and NOT receive a BG, you have Lieutenant Dan to thank, dontcha know? Better luck tomorrow although I understand Pat Sajak wants to ride, so...
![]()
That’s the worst part to you? I mean I don’t want to start this debate but, really?
Actually he or she has a point. At some point Star Wars needs to evolve. The Force Awakens felt fresh and original because it washed the bad taste of the prequels out of my mouth and resurrected a look that was more OT-inspired. That's why everyone was doing jumping jacks over the whole "JJ Abrams is bringing back practical effects!!!" thing, myself included. But then Rogue One copied that look...and so did The Last Jedi. I didn't even bother to see Solo in theatres because it looked so aesthetically similar to the three movies that preceded it. I've long thought that the tired art direction is just as relevant to Solo's failure as the aimless storytelling of the ST.
The expensively-rusty, Jim Henson-y practical effects-driven OT-esque aesthetic simultaneously looks tremendous and has worn out its welcome. It works on The Mandalorian but somehow, it has become boring to look at on the big screen. Just imagine if we got a Star Wars movie set 100...heck, 1000 years into the future. Or the past? It's tantalizing to think about because it would look so alien.
Luke basically became Yoda - ran away and hid when things went south.You have a really good point. It does render the ST kinda a failure. I went into the Last Jedi expecting it to show how powerful Luke became and it was just an epic fail. If it was up to me I would've had the land be set around the OT due to the fact how iconic it is.
Luke basically became Yoda - ran away and hid when things went south.
He felt he created Kylo. He was ashamed, and felt he could not longer trust his instinct or The Force. Yoda simply went to a swamp and waited 800 years to die dramatically on a cliffhanger. (Seriously, he couldn't have brought up that Leia was his sister in all that time, waiting until his last breath?)Yoda didn’t go there all angry about the Jedi and simply to die. Yoda actually couldn’t fight off the emperor. I’m pretty sure Luke knew he could take Kylo. He was mad at himself. Big difference. Out of character to have zero hope in Kylo’s redemption after the hope he had in his father who literally caused mass genocide and murdered children. Kylo hasn’t even done half of what Vader did.
He felt he created Kylo. He was ashamed, and felt he could not longer trust his instinct or The Force. Yoda simply went to a swamp and waited 800 years to die dramatically on a cliffhanger. (Seriously, he couldn't have brought up that Leia was his sister in all that time, waiting until his last breath?)
He felt he created Kylo. He was ashamed, and felt he could not longer trust his instinct or The Force. Yoda simply went to a swamp and waited 800 years to die dramatically on a cliffhanger. (Seriously, he couldn't have brought up that Leia was his sister in all that time, waiting until his last breath?)
Well, Rogue One was directly set in that era soActually he or she has a point. At some point Star Wars needs to evolve. The Force Awakens felt fresh and original because it washed the bad taste of the prequels out of my mouth and resurrected a look that was more OT-inspired. That's why everyone was doing jumping jacks over the whole "JJ Abrams is bringing back practical effects!!!" thing, myself included. But then Rogue One copied that look...and so did The Last Jedi. I didn't even bother to see Solo in theatres because it looked so aesthetically similar to the three movies that preceded it. I've long thought that the tired art direction is just as relevant to Solo's failure as the aimless storytelling of the ST.
The expensively-rusty, Jim Henson-y practical effects-driven OT-esque aesthetic simultaneously looks tremendous and has worn out its welcome. It works on The Mandalorian but somehow, it has become boring to look at on the big screen. Just imagine if we got a Star Wars movie set 100...heck, 1000 years into the future. Or the past? It's tantalizing to think about because it would look so alien.
What’s funny is they went all in for the OT look but what we really loved were the characters and how they played on one another which for me has barely happened with the new characters at all. Ship designs and stuff were never really part of the PT criticism as far as I can tell. It was the terrible and cringey dialogue.The prequels actually did steer the look of the universe in new directions. The Naboo craft looked futuristic compared to what the fighters looked like in the OT. The reason you feel this way about Disney is because they are afraid to steer SW in any direction other than the familiar. Right down to making sure everything is inspired by Ralp Mcquarrie. While this is a noble avenue to take, it’s not like George only ever stuck to his vision alone from an artistic perspective. They’re afraid to deviate at all.
Somehow they simultaneously have forgotten to incorporate any alien species we would recognize or that have color to them. You would think we would see more Rodians, Ithorians, etc. I am surprised they didn’t even try to go down the route of having any major characters as aliens ala Jabba, etc. in the ST. Yet somehow they’ve managed to push the boundaries on characters we love like Luke to the point of making him unrecognizable. This ST is a mess. It feels like it lacks any one person guiding it and it does.
Who really knows.I wonder how much of the talk about introducing OT characters into SW:GE was a direct response to the less than stellar reception in CA when the land first opened? I’m sure there were quite a number of panicked discussions on what the options were to fix things, especially if RoTR opening also bombed. I also wonder if those discussions will be tabled or at least delayed now that RoTR appears to be a pretty big success from its limited opening run. They may want to see the operations stabilize and also see a successful opening in CA, but if both those things happen does it make any sense to change the ride? Even if it’s a quick, easy and relatively cheap overlay?
It could happen within a year. Let me stress no decision has been made yet.
Thank you. It’s still a possibility, not a probability.I’m sure he’s correct about higher level discussions.
On this topic, it interests me that the expansion pads at both lands earmarked for 3rd attractions don't seem to be In the same place. DL's seems to be up by Kylo's ship while WDW's is down across from Rise of the Resistance. By their own rules, attractions in such locations would have to be super different to make thematic sense. Is there a chance we see the Galaxy's Edges each expand with a different attraction?..."A possibility" can be by insiders or outsiders. None of my insiders have mentioned this at all, at either land,
They only hint of a future was that a 3rd expansion pad is available at both lands but not expected to be considered until 2029
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.