BlakeW39
Well-Known Member
As many insiders have suggested, they're looking to do Zootopia cheap and quick.
Ah yes, the two things TWDC is specifically known for: building attractions quickly and without going over budget
As many insiders have suggested, they're looking to do Zootopia cheap and quick.
Chris Beaty highlights the train ride and how that could be in the theme parks, Lee highlights the Bunny Burrow in the same context, where they discuss exploring the different biomes.And, for the peanut gallery, a page or so ago I mentioned that Lee wanted the exhibit to have Bunnyburrow,
At the very least you'd think they'd look and say "Let's MAKE a good Dinosaur movie" (though, obviously, not the "Good Dinosaur" movie).I don't know how true this is, but from my understanding Dinoland is actually the closest they've come to a successful dinosaur franchise. People still spend their money on dinosaurs, apparently, cheesy environment or scary ride aside.
You'd think that capitalizing on something that's well established to be a consistent gold mine but that they haven't managed to create a well liked film for would be something good for the parks, but apparently not.
BTW, the acquired Fox studios acquired accounted for 16 of the 22 Academy Award nominations this year. Disney now gets cachet for the adult and prestige content that it never had before.
My best guess based off of nothing would be that that'll try to mimic the ride story as much as possible while fitting it into the existing Dino layout. So while not a 1 for 1 clone of the new attraction being built, perhaps something closer to a cousin of it. Just my guess based on nothing but my brains.I don't think it'll be a copy & paste. I believe the one in Shanghai is trackless, and from what insiders have said it doesn't sound like they're going to gut the building and fully rebuild like they did for GMR to MMRR.
a safe bet is that the ride system and track layout stays as is. this one is a retheme, so think Frozen and Splash. Things may change in there, but the bones of everything will mostly likely be what it always was. (So not a Engery/Guardians situation)i dont think it will be a clone as they use 2 completely different ride systems. Maybe they gut the entire ride though??? But if they did that, hopefully they could save the dino/IJ ride system and move it to another location, idealy DHS.
Marvel & Lucasfilm got Disney the boy market they desperately needed after being a predominantly Princess oriented company. Fox has always been the bigger question mark, yet it did allow them to not only regain some core Marvel IP but also full ownership of Avatar, and that IP speaks for itself.Marvel, Fox, and Lucasfilm were all unnecessary acquisitions that have diluted the Disney brand.
Im sure there are many high-dollar Disney execs who agree with your assessment, and that is precisely the problem that Disney faces long term.Marvel & Lucasfilm got Disney the boy market they desperately needed after being a predominantly Princess oriented company. Fox has always been the bigger question mark, yet it did allow them to not only regain some core Marvel IP but also full ownership of Avatar, and that IP speaks for itself.
$40 Billion actually. And more than award winning content.Idk man, $71.3b seems like an awful lot of money for 16 Academy Award nominations, Avatar, and The Simpsons…
$40 Billion actually. And more than award winning content.
No wonder you look upon the Fox acquisition so negatively if you're so misinformed about it.
$40 Billion actually. And more than award winning content.
No wonder you look upon the Fox acquisition so negatively if you're so misinformed about it.
The proposed tie-up was quickly complicated, though, when Comcast Corp. made a competing $65 billion offer for the Fox assets. The resulting bidding war culminated with Disney’s final $71.3 billion offer last June. Comcast ended up winning control of Fox’s stake in Sky PLC.
thats also true, they sold sky and some foxsports stuff and more.Disney *bought* a 39% stake in Sky with that $70B since it was part of Fox.
So, how did Comcast get a hold of it?
Oh, yeah, Comcast bought it from 21st Century Fox for $15B which went into Disney's pocket.
You aren't considering in that $70B figure all the stuff Disney sold off to lower what it did finally pay in the end for Fox.
Disney *bought* a 39% stake in Sky with that $70B since it was part of Fox.
So, how did Comcast get a hold of it?
Oh, yeah, Comcast bought it from 21st Century Fox for $15B which went into Disney's pocket.
You aren't considering in that $70B figure all the stuff Disney sold off to lower what it did finally pay in the end for Fox.
That's the very definition of paying less when you don't cherry pick one slice of time to add up your ledger accounts in order to make things seem worse than they are.Disney selling off portions of Fox is evidence that the Fox merger was, by and large, an unnecessary purchase. It is not evidence that Disney paid less for the company.
Breaking: Star Wars Galactic Starcruiser to be rethemed to Moana!
just kidding
but am I?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.