Thrill
Well-Known Member
It turns out they've decided to give into the disco labeling and this is what is being done: http://img153.imageshack.us/i/discoyeti.jpg/
Now this is sheer brilliance.
It turns out they've decided to give into the disco labeling and this is what is being done: http://img153.imageshack.us/i/discoyeti.jpg/
That's OK, "beer" was used in the generic social sense, I prefer Scotch. :animwink: [Thankfully, it's almost reasonably priced when you combine the healthy pour at R&C with the TiW discount].
And I "got" the joke... I replied with one. Martin's right, humour can be lost on the web. :shrug:
Rest assured, we didn't leave "lubricating the Yeti" alone in the euphemism department. Were you present when we were recording? I assumed I was listening to a child in the background.
The opposition to your track record comes from how the information is presented. You have to anticipate people will question your track record because people that take Disney too seriously can't handle sorting the "extra content" in your posts.
I liked the decor of Sanaa, but I wasn't a fan of the food.
There seems to be a bit of an inferiority complex among parts of Imagineering. Supposedly Bob offered to help as a consultant on the Mark VIIs but was roundly refused.
We are trying to find our niche. But the reason we created a show was because there are too many podcasts out there that take Disney too seriously. I love Disney as much as anyone on here, and I can have a serious conversation about it for hours. However outside of those hardcore Disney fans, that's simply not interesting.I do think Lee should get residuals for that.:ROFLOL:
Maybe he could put out tees?
I was present for some of Lee's professorial lecture on all things Mouseworthy, but I don't think you heard me as I am a pretty silent Spirit when I don't wish to be heard. We were outdoors between a few restaurants and there were a lot of people walking around, including kids.
I was impressed that Lee seemed pretty well able to tune them out and talk about yeti lubricating and other such topics of import.
On a more serious note (and first let me state I have never listened to ANY Disney podcast, so I'm not familiar with that world), I'm curious as to whether you do what you do just for fun and because of a love of Disney, or if you are hoping to jump on the new Disney 'social media' whorefest that hands out free hotel stays, airfare, cruises, event invites and swag to 'media' that never says anything bad about the Mouse.
That's not meant as an insult, btw. I just wouldn't give any credence to people that Disney paid off for their 'coverage' and hoping you aren't part of that crowd that seems to be expanding daily.
Absolutely. I find that I'm constantly thinking about Disney (often times it's from an uber-nerdy operations standpoint, or a show idea).Ah, but track record speaks to the factual basis of what I post (when I am being serious). And as a podcaster and big Disney fan, wouldn't you agree that many fans take the company and its products far too seriously?
The thing with the Yeti is that it is the single biggest icon for declining by degrees. Everest is a good coaster without it, but it was a difference maker for the attraction. Having said that, there are others on here that would make the same claim about the Lights of Winter removal being the single biggest icon for declining by degrees. I'm not sure if that portion of our conversation made it to the show this week, but I know I mentioned that the fact there was a 200+ page thread on the Lights of Winter on WDWMagic is absolutely ridiculous.For instance, I don't think I'm going to like the new Mansion queue because I hate the whole concept behind them, which is people are dumber than ever (likely true) with the attention span of knats and they are unable to simply wait in a queue for an attraction, so Disney needs to give them something to entertain themselves so they don't Twitter or update their status or play games of their own while waiting ... yet, look at how many posts there are on that subject.
Even this yeti deal. Look at how many posts we have. Is the yeti that important? I'd argue the larger points such as overall show quality standards at WDW and value provided for money paid would be the overriding issues.
I've enjoyed it everytime I've been (four times now), although once we did have an issue with a raw burger being replaced by another one almost as bad and the manager didn't seem to feel this was a major concern, which soured me a bit on the place (the burger wasn't mine as I wouldn't go there for that, but it still should have been cooked!)
Was the slightly homophobic remark really necessary? Or should I point out that you noticed the bulge in the first place?
Please. I am far from homophobic and so was the remark.
It spoke to a poster's continued unhealthy obsession with me on this site that the mods don't seem to have an issue with. So, if it's all just in fun then so be it ...
Does anyone know if I can obtain a full version of the special on the Discovery channel about EE rather than just watching it on You Tube? Thanks in advance for the help.
We are trying to find our niche. But the reason we created a show was because there are too many podcasts out there that take Disney too seriously. I love Disney as much as anyone on here, and I can have a serious conversation about it for hours. However outside of those hardcore Disney fans, that's simply not interesting.
Our objective was to create a show that is more easily digestible. One that doesn't sugar coat things, but also one that doesn't take Disney too seriously. We can joke about it, and we occasionally cross some lines with our humor that other shows wouldn't. We even had to go to the extent of releasing monthly uncensored shows that are basically content that was too inappropriate for what the expectations have become for a Disney podcast.
As for getting free stuff - it hasn't happened yet, but I wouldn't be opposed to receiving some of that. This may sound cliche, but I believe that if we were to accept any type of free swag (I'll be requesting press credentials for the D23 convention for example) it won't change the nature of our show.
With all that in mind, I listen to several Disney podcasts (Inside the Magic, WDW Today, WDW Radio Show, Magical Definition, and Mousechat.net), and I like each of them for different reasons.
Absolutely. I find that I'm constantly thinking about Disney (often times it's from an uber-nerdy operations standpoint, or a show idea).
And to give you an even nerdier answer I'll quote Ben Franklin at the American Adventure:
"I may have invented these bifocals I'm wearing, but I can assure you they're not rose-colored"
There are those in the podcast community, and those on the internet fan community that never question Disney on anything. Then there are those that seemingly question everything they do despite claiming to love the company. For lack of a better comparison, think of it from a political standpoint - most of the political media is either extreme right or extreme left, when reality is somewhere in the middle.
We've been complaining about the Yeti for quite some time. We're not alone, it's a legitimate complaint. Like others we've complained about Stitch's Great Escape, yet we've pointed out that there are some good components to the attraction (the AA, the music, the cryptogram).
The thing with the Yeti is that it is the single biggest icon for declining by degrees. Everest is a good coaster without it, but it was a difference maker for the attraction. Having said that, there are others on here that would make the same claim about the Lights of Winter removal being the single biggest icon for declining by degrees. I'm not sure if that portion of our conversation made it to the show this week, but I know I mentioned that the fact there was a 200+ page thread on the Lights of Winter on WDWMagic is absolutely ridiculous.
I've only been to Sanaa once, I'm sure I'll eventually return because I would still like to see the new Kadani Exclusive Savannah (I believe it's called the Pembe Savannah).
I would assume that it will depend on how the repair works out. If the fix works I would assume that a slightly redesigned yeti would be in Shanghai's version. If the fix only takes the yeti to sort of working I'll wager that they will get a somewhat static figure.Just wondering out loud...
Knowing that a version of Everest is planned for one of Shanghai's expansion pads....wonder what they'll do about the yeti situation.
Build him right this time?
Skip him altogether?
Do it a new way?
Hire Bigfoot instead?
:shrug:
Just wondering out loud...
Knowing that a version of Everest is planned for one of Shanghai's expansion pads....wonder what they'll do about the yeti situation.
Build him right this time?
Skip him altogether?
Do it a new way?
Hire Bigfoot instead?
:shrug:
Just wondering out loud...
Knowing that a version of Everest is planned for one of Shanghai's expansion pads....wonder what they'll do about the yeti situation.
Build him right this time?
Skip him altogether?
Do it a new way?
Hire Bigfoot instead?
:shrug:
I'm guessing a smiling panda that gives you a slight wave of his paw.Just wondering out loud...
Knowing that a version of Everest is planned for one of Shanghai's expansion pads....wonder what they'll do about the yeti situation.
Build him right this time?
Skip him altogether?
Do it a new way?
Hire Bigfoot instead?
:shrug:
I thought the main issue was the missing lube that caused a dramatic increase in friction between mechanical parts that wasn't supposed to have any??? (I was trying to work while listening to your podcast so I might have missed something) In which case I'm sure that step will be in bold font and underlined with a disclaimer that anyone who messes this up again will be kicked to the curb with no possible chance of working in the industry again...
So basically the whole problem was the yeti was chafing and could have been fixed with
?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.