How come they can build a $20mil intersection in a year, but have this temporary diesel powered lamp post at the entrance of EPCOT for the past 30 years?
A flippin' men.How come they can build a $20mil intersection in a year, but have this temporary diesel powered lamp post at the entrance of EPCOT for the past 30 years?
Diesel powered lamp post?How come they can build a $20mil intersection in a year, but have this temporary diesel powered lamp post at the entrance of EPCOT for the past 30 years?
I think that part of Epcot is operated by the transportation dept, which we know doesn't have two pennies to rub together.How come they can build a $20mil intersection in a year, but have this temporary diesel powered lamp post at the entrance of EPCOT for the past 30 years?
Give me a few LED floodlights and a ladder and I’ll do it me self. It’s not even like they don’t have an adjacent, perfectly positioned building to mount them on.I think that part of Epcot is operated by the transportation dept, which we know doesn't have two pennies to rub together.
@marni1971 , do you have a picture of this lamp post for the discussion?Diesel powered lamp post?
@marni1971 , do you have a picture of this lamp post for the discussion?
How come they can build a $20mil intersection in a year, but have this temporary diesel powered lamp post at the entrance of EPCOT for the past 30 years?
There go the ticket price again”This coming out of the budget slated for Epcot?
Thats a good one” maybe thay forgot to run the underground wires ..How come they can build a $20mil intersection in a year, but have this temporary diesel powered lamp post at the entrance of EPCOT for the past 30 years?
Close. They are using RCID funds and Municipal bonds, no park revenue, to do all WDW infrastructure work. So the roads ways, parking garages, etc, are not coming out of Disney's pocket. That lighting at the entrance of the Epcot could likely fall under that but I bet it falling being the parks, which surely keep deferring the expense and yet too small off a need/project and it just not on RC radar.Probably because they got a federal grant for this project instead of having to pay out of their own pocket.
Except RCID’s funds come from its land-owning taxpayers, which by some magical coincidence, happen to be almost entirely the Walt Disney Company and its subsidiaries/affiliates. So in a way that works all too well, the RCID money is coming from a pocket that has money constantly put into it by Disney from their pockets. This same strategy has been in place from the very beginning, and it works out (mostly) in the general Floridian taxpayer’s favor.Close. They are using RCID funds and Municipal bonds, no park revenue, to do all WDW infrastructure work. So the roads ways, parking garages, etc, are not coming out of Disney's pocket.
I don't know how it all works, but, really it seems to me that if the taxpayers in Florida, or anywhere else for that matter, were paying completely for any onsite, private property, highly profitable business infrastructure changes there would likely be a massive revolt. Whatever, Disney needs on their property, Disney can afford. It's like saying that taxpayers should pay for your driveway on your property. Now where the internal meets with public lands, like I-4 or 192, for example, then it might be in the best interest for public accesses from public highways be somewhat supplemented by taxpayers money. It might be a way to help the traffic flow to and from those locations and then be in the interest of the general public even if the general public never goes on WDW property.Except RCID’s funds come from its land-owning taxpayers, which by some magical coincidence, happen to be almost entirely the Walt Disney Company and its subsidiaries/affiliates. So in a way that works all too well, the RCID money is coming from a pocket that has money constantly put into it by Disney from their pockets. This same strategy has been in place from the very beginning, and it works out (mostly) in the general Floridian taxpayer’s favor.
Yes. But not "except" Disney has to pay tax just either way. With RCID they are the largest and almost the only tax player. So they get the benefit equally was much. Its still the case that all these infrastructure projects are coming out of Reedy Creek pocket, not Disney's pocket. Disney has to pay the taxes either way. So there is no additional cost to Disney for these infrastructure projects.Except RCID’s funds come from its land-owning taxpayers, which by some magical coincidence, happen to be almost entirely the Walt Disney Company and its subsidiaries/affiliates. So in a way that works all too well, the RCID money is coming from a pocket that has money constantly put into it by Disney from their pockets. This same strategy has been in place from the very beginning, and it works out (mostly) in the general Floridian taxpayer’s favor.
Disney is paying taxes to more than just Reedy Creek.Yes. But not "except" Disney has to pay tax just either way. With RCID they are the largest and almost the only tax player. So they get the benefit equally was much. Its still the case that all these infrastructure projects are coming out of Reedy Creek pocket, not Disney's pocket. Disney has to pay the taxes either way. So there is no additional cost to Disney for these infrastructure projects.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.