SuddenStorm
Well-Known Member
Let’s do a thought experiment: Imagine if Disneyland existed for 60 years without Adventureland. And then one day they open Adventureland. Walking through it, you very well may say “I don’t feel like I’m in Disneyland at all! I feel like I’m in a faraway jungle village!”
Now the super-IP-ness of Galaxy’s Edge is definitely something Disneyland hasn’t seen before, and that is something this Adventureland analogy can’t recreate. But I do think that in a few years time a trip to Black Spire Outpost will feel as much like Disneyland as Temple of the Forbidden Eye does.
I like this Adventureland comparison... let's run with it. What does Adventureland do that makes it fit better in Disneyland than Galaxy's Edge?
It's an abstract theme- "adventure", that WDI has been able to reinterpret over the decades to keep the land relevant and exciting. The one IP that's utilized in the land- Indiana Jones Adventure- is utilized because Indiana Jones is as pure "adventure" as you can get, and to do the ride without or with any other property would work, but it'd be a lesser attraction.
It's scale is intimate and charming- it fits with the rest of the park in terms of building size, walkway width, etc.- which is far more than Galaxy's Edge can say.
It's able to immediately transition into the New Orleans and Frontier areas almost seamlessly- the transition is so wonderfully done that you almost don't notice it happening.
It's a natural part of Disneyland's cardinal realms- it'd almost feel like there's something missing if there wasn't an adventure section at the park.
Whether Black Spire Outpost ever feels as much a part of Disneyland as IJA partly depends on how Disneyland treats the land. If they always require a virtual reservation to enter, it will always feel fragmented and separate from the rest of the park. If it's allowed to be free flowing with the rest of the park, than yes- it will become synonymous with Disneyland, though I do think it will always feel a bit separate emotionally.
Edit to add- isn't the fact Galaxy's Edge is IP based as a critical part of the equation that shouldn't be downplayed? The fact it's IP based provides significant limitations on what they can and can't do to the land in the future to adapt to changing consumer tastes.
Last edited: