WDW Confirms a HUGE Rumor Proof right here...

[One Lil Spark]

I can't find anyone named Ronda Kendall in any CM directories. :shrug:

Straight from a CM's mouth = Good enough for me! :xmas:

 

[Walt_Disney]

I would like to see the e-mail header information.. IP address... routing... etc... everything sans your full e-mail addy of course. :wave:

Again this email is NOT Fake, I will be happy to forward it anyone who would like it.


And here is he full header from the email:


rom

Walt Disney World Guest Mail <guest.mail@wdw.disneyonline.com>to

xxxxx@gmail.com
date

Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:43 AMsubject

Re: Request for General Information about Walt Disney World Resort (KMM34274284I15977L0KM)

 

[ewensell3]

Again this email is NOT Fake, I will be happy to forward it anyone who would like it.


And here is he full header from the email:


rom

Walt Disney World Guest Mail <guest.mail@wdw.disneyonline.com>to

xxxxx@gmail.com
date

Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:43 AMsubject

Re: Request for General Information about Walt Disney World Resort (KMM34274284I15977L0KM)

In Gmail there is an arrow in the upper right corner.

Click it and select "Show Original"

The "Full Header" is everything before the first line of the message body.

 

[captainkidd]

Sorry, but I don't buy it either. I've never seen Disney let information like that leak to someone in the general public.

 

[Walt_Disney]

In Gmail there is an arrow in the upper right corner.

Click it and select "Show Original"

The "Full Header" is everything before the first line of the message body.

Here is the Full Header:

Delivered-To: xxxxx@gmail.com
Received: by 10.100.166.6 with SMTP id o6cs58773ane;
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:43:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.141.162.16 with SMTP id p16mr1048821rvo.280.1229618623863;
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <guest.mail@wdw.disneyonline.com>
Received: from mailrly02ff.starwave.com (mailrly02ff.starwave.com [199.181.135.23])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f21si6378714rvb.7.2008.12.18.08.43.43;
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 199.181.135.23 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of guest.mail@wdw.disneyonline.com) client-ip=199.181.135.23;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 199.181.135.23 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of guest.mail@wdw.disneyonline.com) smtp.mail=guest.mail@wdw.disneyonline.com
Received: from [10.192.64.55] by mailrly02ff.starwave.com
(Sendmail MMA v1.4.3.Beta1) with SMIP id mBI8hh06338IzKVp;
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <22032880.1229618622627.JavaMail.kana@kanaapp18.starwave.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:43:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Walt Disney World Guest Mail <guest.mail@wdw.disneyonline.com>
To: <xxxxx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Request for General Information about Walt Disney World Resort (KMM34274284I15977L0KM)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
x-mailer: KANA Response 10.2.0.13

 

[tirian]

I don't know whether this letter is real or a fake, but I can confirm that land was supposed to start moving in 2009. I honestly don't know whether or not this is still on schedule now.

 

[Iknewagirlnamed]

Coupla things that make it iffy...

A) The email does not use correct corporate naming structure. It should be "Disney's Animal Kingdom Park" (with an (R) mark beside it).

B) "Other then" should be "other than"

C) There's no way in hell that Imagineering would "confirm" that they were building a new land like that. There would be rumors, etc, but any "confirmation" would come through the typical media channels (IE, a well-crafted media release, etc).

Somebody's playing with ya, I think.

Someone could always write to Disney in regards to this e-mail and ask for verification

 

[Lee]

I don't know whether this letter is real or a fake, but I can confirm that land was supposed to start moving in 2009. I honestly don't know whether or not this is still on schedule now.

Ditto.
If that email had been sent a few months ago....no problem.
Now...that 2012 is a bit...ummm...iffy.

 

[yeti]

Consider this dismaying observation: there is no "Disney's" and no copyright symbol, which offers you this chilling challenge: to admit its bogus!


AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....

 

[GoofyDadKB]

The header info looks legit. As for the body of the message I can't say.

 

[maggiegrace1]

The header info looks legit. As for the body of the message I can't say.

That could have been copied from any email that was sent to him from Disney if he had asked them a question before..all you have to do is change the date..

Now if he would show us a screen shot of the email that would be different.

Also..the fact that a WDW cast member checked and saw that there is no cast member with that name is enough proof for me.:shrug:

 

[Ausdaddy]

I do not believe that Walt would fake this email. He wouldn't lie about his own company.

 

[havoc]

Are you sure you sent it to the guest mailbox and not the transportation mailbox?

 

[WDWmazprty]

I guess we'll find out soon enough after everything is done with whatever is going or not going on with Yeti, whenever it comes back.

 

[WDWmazprty]

LOLOLOL! Wrong thread. :hammer:

 

[DMC-12]

The header info looks legit. As for the body of the message I can't say.

Yep... I just combed through it as well... and as far as I can tell... it (the header) seems legit. :shrug:

 

[Pumbas Nakasak]

Its not that big, typical man.

 

[George]

The most amazing thing is that in Oct. 2006, the name "Walt_Disney" was available.

 

[marni1971]

Someone somewhere told the wrong person the right thing

:lookaroun

 

[Wilt Dasney]

Are you sure you sent it to the guest mailbox and not the transportation mailbox?

Excellent. :lol:

If we could just e-mail monorail pilots and bus drivers, it would save a lot of needless "vacationing" in search of new rumors.